Galaxy Legion Forum http://galaxylegion.com/forum/ |
|
Planetary defense http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=16286 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Dr Bill [ Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Planetary defense |
What's the minimum planet space to divert to researched defensive planet builds? |
Author: | Lone.Lycan [ Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Planetary defense |
0 technically you don't need any defense on a planet technically you don't need anything on a planet you defend based on the size and stats for that size... and based on how many planets you've lost so far personally, i don't defend most large planets (but i also usually don't increase their production either)... i just drop 3 +10's and move on very large and up get 2 ob shields, 2 qc mines, and an assortment of pop and cloak based on planet size and the extra space left after +10 buildings are placed |
Author: | jalevf [ Sat Nov 19, 2011 12:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Planetary defense |
what is better InvasionDefense(300) or Defense (450)? |
Author: | Darth Flagitious [ Sat Nov 19, 2011 12:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Planetary defense |
jalevf wrote: what is better InvasionDefense(300) or Defense (450)? Assuming they don't have access to Zolazin Saboteurs or Crimson Cluster Missiles, the 450 standard defense is better. If they do, its kind of a toss-up. The standard defense would make it harder to get the population down but is sabotagable (word?? lol) while the Invasion Defense structure doesn't help during the depopulation process but is immune to sabotage/CCM and continues to be effective when they make the invasion roll. Best bet, go with both. |
Author: | kirkeastment [ Sat Nov 19, 2011 3:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Planetary defense |
Darth Flagitious wrote: jalevf wrote: what is better InvasionDefense(300) or Defense (450)? Assuming they don't have access to Zolazin Saboteurs or Crimson Cluster Missiles, the 450 standard defense is better. If they do, its kind of a toss-up. The standard defense would make it harder to get the population down but is sabotagable (word?? lol) while the Invasion Defense structure doesn't help during the depopulation process but is immune to sabotage/CCM and continues to be effective when they make the invasion roll. Best bet, go with both. The invasion defense(300 = soldier outpost) isn't immune to sabotage/CCM the same goes for the council building(100 pop/500 invasion defense), both can be sabbed/ccm'd, as i've seen them sabbed. |
Author: | Darth Flagitious [ Sat Nov 19, 2011 3:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Planetary defense |
kirkeastment wrote: Darth Flagitious wrote: jalevf wrote: what is better InvasionDefense(300) or Defense (450)? Assuming they don't have access to Zolazin Saboteurs or Crimson Cluster Missiles, the 450 standard defense is better. If they do, its kind of a toss-up. The standard defense would make it harder to get the population down but is sabotagable (word?? lol) while the Invasion Defense structure doesn't help during the depopulation process but is immune to sabotage/CCM and continues to be effective when they make the invasion roll. Best bet, go with both. The invasion defense(300 = soldier outpost) isn't immune to sabotage/CCM the same goes for the council building(100 pop/500 invasion defense), both can be sabbed/ccm'd, as i've seen them sabbed. Yep, sorry 'bout that. I didn't look up what gives 300 invasion defense. ![]() ![]() |
Author: | jalevf [ Sat Nov 19, 2011 6:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Planetary defense |
ok! thanks |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |