Galaxy Legion Forum
http://galaxylegion.com/forum/

Two planetary analysis/reality transfuser questions
http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=32958		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Leviii [ Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Two planetary analysis/reality transfuser questions
Could the RNG possibly be so mean as to give you Advanced Civilization Ruins on a gas or plasma world when using a reality transfuser?
Also, would it be better to use the transfuser first or the Phasic chain ionizer?
Thanks
Author:  Super [ Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Two planetary analysis/reality transfuser questions
Leviii wrote:
Could the RNG possibly be so mean as to give you Advanced Civilization Ruins on a gas or plasma world when using a reality transfuser? It has a chance to give you that
Also, would it be better to use the transfuser first or the Phasic chain ionizer? Which ever way you prefer
Thanks

Answers in red
Author:  elerian [ Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Two planetary analysis/reality transfuser questions
1. yes
2. not sure, as the pool of what you can get may / may not be skewed by the target being a gas planet like the temporary effects are.
Author:  Pongoloid [ Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Two planetary analysis/reality transfuser questions
Leviii wrote:
Could the RNG possibly be so mean as to give you Advanced Civilization Ruins on a gas or plasma world when using a reality transfuser?
I had this same exact question a few weeks ago. Had an extra transfuser, and wanted to use it on a gas planet I was going to ionize... but didn't want to end up with a basically useless "Artifact Plasma" world. I was concerned enough to use the Report/Contact button to ask Dan about it. He said:

"No, the ruins would only appear on planets that have notable artifact resources."

So... you're safe.

Interestingly enough, after this, I asked "So does this mean your chances of getting rings are increased by using the Transfuser on a gas planet," using the logic that three options rather than four would up the odds for the remaining Transfuser effects (small moons, large moons, rings), but he said no. So I assume it just ups your chances for small and/or large moons.

Quote:
Also, would it be better to use the transfuser first or the Phasic chain ionizer?
Depends on how much you care about how your planet ends up. If you just must have rings or large moons on the planet, the only way to be sure is to analyze first and ionize later. Once you've upgraded the planet, there's no going back.
Author:  Leviii [ Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Two planetary analysis/reality transfuser questions
Pongoloid, Thanks so much for this info. Straight from the horse's mouth so to speak.
I was holding off using the transfuser but now feel much better going ahead with my plan.
Transfuser first than ionizer = awesome research world :)
Author:  Wertz [ Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Two planetary analysis/reality transfuser questions
A 15x to 17x Plasma is more than ''awesome" enough for a research planet. Imho waste of a transfuser, far better to use it on an artifact planet. I can't help thinking you'll wish later that you had saved it for a better planet. But hey, your money, your game.
Author:  Narbooty [ Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Two planetary analysis/reality transfuser questions
Wertz wrote:
A 15x to 17x Plasma is more than ''awesome" enough for a research planet. Imho waste of a transfuser, far better to use it on an artifact planet. I can't help thinking you'll wish later that you had saved it for a better planet. But hey, your money, your game.


Gotta agree with this guy. Save it and thank us later.
Author:  Pongoloid [ Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Two planetary analysis/reality transfuser questions
Yeah, they are expensive, and better used on artifact planets. A +10% space increase on Very Massive or Colossal artifact world is worth a lot more than +20% production or space on a Plasma. Unless you have virtually limitless GP burning a hole in your pocket, it's not the wisest investment. Just because I tend to make poor decisions when I have the GP available doesn't mean you should, Leviii.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/