Galaxy Legion Forum http://galaxylegion.com/forum/ |
|
Upkeep question http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=39684 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Torres9 [ Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Upkeep question |
1. If you do not log in into galaxy legion in 3 days , the upkeep cycle will stop. Is it true ? 2. So, if you are governor and do not log in in 3 days or more, your upkeep stop and the governor effect for 3x event also stop ? ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | asquall [ Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Upkeep question |
1st question. No. Your upkeep will stop once you've gone inactive. |
Author: | Arbiter [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Upkeep question |
Yes, it stops after 3 days. I do not know if this ties into the Events or not. Here is the update regarding upkeep: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16424 |
Author: | asquall [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 2:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Upkeep question |
Arbiter wrote: Yes, it stops after 3 days after becoming inactive I do not know if this ties into the Events or not. Here is the update regarding upkeep: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16424 Fixed that for ya. That means you'll need 10 days total to become inactive. |
Author: | Arbiter [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Upkeep question |
asquall wrote: Arbiter wrote: Yes, it stops after 3 days after becoming inactive I do not know if this ties into the Events or not. Here is the update regarding upkeep: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16424 Fixed that for ya. That means you'll need 10 days total to become inactive. It's probably only after 3 days, unless you have some evidence to the contrary. For example, the CT Lab will say you can only use it if you "have been Loyal for 7 days". Following your understanding (which I do agree with), that would mean being a member for 2 weeks - 7 days after becoming Loyal. However, that is not the case. |
Author: | Darth Flagitious [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Upkeep question |
Dan clarified this a long time ago (I missed it myself thanks to sketchy net). It's after 3 days. Period. Not 3 days after becoming Inactive. |
Author: | Arbiter [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Upkeep question |
Darth Flagitious wrote: Dan clarified this a long time ago (I missed it myself thanks to sketchy net). It's after 3 days. Period. Not 3 days after becoming Inactive. Ah, I didn't think to search his regular posts. viewtopic.php?f=6&t=16461&p=147631&hilit=+upkeep#p147631 |
Author: | asquall [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Upkeep question |
Quote: Ships will no longer be required to pay upkeep after 3 days of being inactive The wording seems to deceive us into thinking it after 10 days ![]() |
Author: | Darth Flagitious [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Upkeep question |
asquall wrote: Quote: Ships will no longer be required to pay upkeep after 3 days of being inactive The wording seems to deceive us into thinking it after 10 days ![]() Hence the clarification post that I referred to and Arbiter linked. |
Author: | Annabell [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Upkeep question |
Actually this stopgap is glitched or simply not functioning at all. I know for a fact that there are multiple people that have gone on hiatus, with over a trillion credits banked, and come back with no credits left, and everything broken, despite months of inactivity. |
Author: | Serne [ Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Upkeep question |
Annabell wrote: Actually this stopgap is glitched or simply not functioning at all. I know for a fact that there are multiple people that have gone on hiatus, with over a trillion credits banked, and come back with no credits left, and everything broken, despite months of inactivity. It is a new thing introduced not long ago, maybe 2 months? Situations such as what you have just described are exactly why he implemented the change according to my understanding. |
Author: | Arbiter [ Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Upkeep question |
Serne wrote: Annabell wrote: Actually this stopgap is glitched or simply not functioning at all. I know for a fact that there are multiple people that have gone on hiatus, with over a trillion credits banked, and come back with no credits left, and everything broken, despite months of inactivity. It is a new thing introduced not long ago, maybe 2 months? Situations such as what you have just described are exactly why he implemented the change according to my understanding. The update I linked was in November 2011. |
Author: | Serne [ Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Upkeep question |
Arbiter wrote: Serne wrote: Annabell wrote: Actually this stopgap is glitched or simply not functioning at all. I know for a fact that there are multiple people that have gone on hiatus, with over a trillion credits banked, and come back with no credits left, and everything broken, despite months of inactivity. It is a new thing introduced not long ago, maybe 2 months? Situations such as what you have just described are exactly why he implemented the change according to my understanding. The update I linked was in November 2011. Seriously? hmmm... I am losing track of time. I though it was one of the things he did quite recently. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |