Galaxy Legion Forum
http://galaxylegion.com/forum/

Upkeep question
http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=39684
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Torres9 [ Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Upkeep question

1. If you do not log in into galaxy legion in 3 days , the upkeep cycle will stop. Is it true ?

2. So, if you are governor and do not log in in 3 days or more, your upkeep stop and the governor effect for 3x event also stop ?
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Author:  asquall [ Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Upkeep question

1st question.
No. Your upkeep will stop once you've gone inactive.

Author:  Arbiter [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Upkeep question

Yes, it stops after 3 days.

I do not know if this ties into the Events or not.

Here is the update regarding upkeep: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16424

Author:  asquall [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 2:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Upkeep question

Arbiter wrote:
Yes, it stops after 3 days after becoming inactive

I do not know if this ties into the Events or not.

Here is the update regarding upkeep: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16424


Fixed that for ya.

That means you'll need 10 days total to become inactive.

Author:  Arbiter [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Upkeep question

asquall wrote:
Arbiter wrote:
Yes, it stops after 3 days after becoming inactive

I do not know if this ties into the Events or not.

Here is the update regarding upkeep: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16424


Fixed that for ya.

That means you'll need 10 days total to become inactive.


It's probably only after 3 days, unless you have some evidence to the contrary.

For example, the CT Lab will say you can only use it if you "have been Loyal for 7 days". Following your understanding (which I do agree with), that would mean being a member for 2 weeks - 7 days after becoming Loyal. However, that is not the case.

Author:  Darth Flagitious [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Upkeep question

Dan clarified this a long time ago (I missed it myself thanks to sketchy net). It's after 3 days. Period. Not 3 days after becoming Inactive.

Author:  Arbiter [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Upkeep question

Darth Flagitious wrote:
Dan clarified this a long time ago (I missed it myself thanks to sketchy net). It's after 3 days. Period. Not 3 days after becoming Inactive.


Ah, I didn't think to search his regular posts. viewtopic.php?f=6&t=16461&p=147631&hilit=+upkeep#p147631

Author:  asquall [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Upkeep question

Quote:
Ships will no longer be required to pay upkeep after 3 days of being inactive


The wording seems to deceive us into thinking it after 10 days :P

Author:  Darth Flagitious [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Upkeep question

asquall wrote:
Quote:
Ships will no longer be required to pay upkeep after 3 days of being inactive


The wording seems to deceive us into thinking it after 10 days :P


Hence the clarification post that I referred to and Arbiter linked.

Author:  Annabell [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Upkeep question

Actually this stopgap is glitched or simply not functioning at all. I know for a fact that there are multiple people that have gone on hiatus, with over a trillion credits banked, and come back with no credits left, and everything broken, despite months of inactivity.

Author:  Serne [ Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Upkeep question

Annabell wrote:
Actually this stopgap is glitched or simply not functioning at all. I know for a fact that there are multiple people that have gone on hiatus, with over a trillion credits banked, and come back with no credits left, and everything broken, despite months of inactivity.


It is a new thing introduced not long ago, maybe 2 months? Situations such as what you have just described are exactly why he implemented the change according to my understanding.

Author:  Arbiter [ Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Upkeep question

Serne wrote:
Annabell wrote:
Actually this stopgap is glitched or simply not functioning at all. I know for a fact that there are multiple people that have gone on hiatus, with over a trillion credits banked, and come back with no credits left, and everything broken, despite months of inactivity.


It is a new thing introduced not long ago, maybe 2 months? Situations such as what you have just described are exactly why he implemented the change according to my understanding.


The update I linked was in November 2011.

Author:  Serne [ Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Upkeep question

Arbiter wrote:
Serne wrote:
Annabell wrote:
Actually this stopgap is glitched or simply not functioning at all. I know for a fact that there are multiple people that have gone on hiatus, with over a trillion credits banked, and come back with no credits left, and everything broken, despite months of inactivity.


It is a new thing introduced not long ago, maybe 2 months? Situations such as what you have just described are exactly why he implemented the change according to my understanding.


The update I linked was in November 2011.


Seriously? hmmm... I am losing track of time. I though it was one of the things he did quite recently.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/