View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 12:29 am



Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
 Rank 191 (Updated) - How am I doing? 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:04 pm
Posts: 77
Reply with quote
Hey everyone, so I have yet to do one of these but I decided that it might be good to see what everyone thinks of my ship. So here are a few pictures for you guys, if you want to know anything else then feel free to ask.

These are the old images. Scroll down for the new ones.

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
"Oatmeal, Are you crazy?!" - Pinkie Pie


Last edited by LaTempesta2 on Wed Mar 27, 2013 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Thu Jan 03, 2013 2:21 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 3632
Location: Gone.
Reply with quote
Needs more defense.

_________________
Image

Devastation - Rank 1209 - Proud Officer of Imperium of Namalak


Thu Jan 03, 2013 2:36 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:53 pm
Posts: 3756
Location: Aboard my floating fortress of ineptitude
Reply with quote
XxDarthDexterxX wrote:
Needs more defense.

Like, a LOT more defense. Hull's looking good though, nice attack, and you seem right on track for everything else.

_________________
Image
Inventor of Invisible SandTM


Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:17 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:35 pm
Posts: 1975
Reply with quote
Pegasister wrote:
Hey everyone, so I have yet to do one of these but I decided that it might be good to see what everyone thinks of my ship. So here are a few pictures for you guys, if you want to know anything else then feel free to ask.

Image

Image

Image

Image


Oh, C'mon. I wanted to see ya's GP

:-)

_________________
ACREWREVOLT

Image


Thu Jan 03, 2013 9:04 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:04 pm
Posts: 77
Reply with quote
Alright, I pulled down my attack by 200 and added 400 defense.

_________________
"Oatmeal, Are you crazy?!" - Pinkie Pie


Thu Jan 03, 2013 9:34 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:12 pm
Posts: 725
Location: England
Reply with quote
bad crew.

_________________
Image


Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:01 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:04 pm
Posts: 77
Reply with quote
Dreadlost wrote:
bad crew.

I appreciate bringing it up, but can you not just use a comment to criticize without telling me what was wrong with it? Tell me what it is specifically I need to do please.

_________________
"Oatmeal, Are you crazy?!" - Pinkie Pie


Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:05 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 1:49 pm
Posts: 175
Reply with quote
Pegasister wrote:
Dreadlost wrote:
bad crew.

I appreciate bringing it up, but can you not just use a comment to criticize without telling me what was wrong with it? Tell me what it is specifically I need to do please.


Looks like you put a lot of work into your engineers and forgot about your poor T.O.s :(

_________________
Image
Image
Image


Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:05 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 1:37 am
Posts: 244
Reply with quote
Bluecifer wrote:
XxDarthDexterxX wrote:
Needs more defense.

Like, a LOT more defense. Hull's looking good though, nice attack, and you seem right on track for everything else.



Is it really?


Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 11:01 am
Posts: 5825
Location: Zolar
Reply with quote
The Hull isn't bad, but it's not the best all things considered.
You have a nice number of engineers, but low TOs. Wouldn't worry about that too much yet, as your attack is in far better shape than your defense.

You should probably have, or soon get Null Rays, as well as Energy Nullifiers.

_________________
ImageImageImageImage


Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:31 pm
Profile WWW
Reply with quote
I think a screenshot or a list of what modules you have installed would help....


Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:11 am
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:04 pm
Posts: 77
Reply with quote
Pikavader wrote:
Pegasister wrote:
Dreadlost wrote:
bad crew.

I appreciate bringing it up, but can you not just use a comment to criticize without telling me what was wrong with it? Tell me what it is specifically I need to do please.


Looks like you put a lot of work into your engineers and forgot about your poor T.O.s :(

I am doing what my old leader Gorog did and alternating 1k engineers and 1k TOs. I did the Engies first because the legion I am in asked me to rank up a bit faster as I am well under the limit they had set for the legion.

_________________
"Oatmeal, Are you crazy?!" - Pinkie Pie


Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:53 am
Profile

Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:02 am
Posts: 92
Reply with quote
You're doing pretty well for your rank imo. Really close with the attack, def, hull I had around that rank and better productions. However, you're a glass cannon right now (which works well until about rank 200, so up that defense soon!!)

And for your crew...I can't remember what I had at that rank, but I was going heavy into deck. So it's good that you're already putting them heavy into engineers, though I would try to keep them pretty balanced with tactical officers.

Also, I saw that someone said to put on null rays for attack and energy nulls for def. Energy nulls are pretty cheap to get, so that would be nice to get. But null rays are really expensive and a horrible idea for someone at your rank (considering I still have heavy nulls and doing quite well at rank 398) So I'd say that Heavy Antiprotons would suit you well until you're comfortable in making that jump in upkeep.

Hope I helped a little! -Km4cK

_________________
ImageImage


Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:46 am
Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:28 pm
Posts: 264
Reply with quote
You really need to up your production, try doubling or tripling you artifact production, that will get you more prisoners, stop putting rank point into decks - put them into TOs instead. also raise your defence, drop any unneeded ship modules. :)

_________________
Image


Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:29 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:12 pm
Posts: 725
Location: England
Reply with quote
Pegasister wrote:
Dreadlost wrote:
bad crew.

I appreciate bringing it up, but can you not just use a comment to criticize without telling me what was wrong with it? Tell me what it is specifically I need to do please.

you ask whats wrong I point it out. simple.

you don't need me to tell you what crew to get, im sure.

_________________
Image


Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:16 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:02 pm
Posts: 1327
Reply with quote
Dreadlost wrote:
Pegasister wrote:
Dreadlost wrote:
bad crew.

I appreciate bringing it up, but can you not just use a comment to criticize without telling me what was wrong with it? Tell me what it is specifically I need to do please.

you ask whats wrong I point it out. simple.

you don't need me to tell you what crew to get, im sure.

I think he means how many crew should he have of each rather than knowhing he has t oincrease his cres as a general statement.

_________________
Image


Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:20 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:13 pm
Posts: 2711
Location: Somewhere trying to find a way to increase the use of Time Manipulators.
Reply with quote
Stop adding decks at r180 and mainly focus on your crew. Decks won't matter on your 'late game' since you'd have a ton of ship-bots laying around collecting dust. Early crew build will benefit you in a long run.

_________________
Why the $%&% are you looking at my signature for...?


Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:41 pm
Profile WWW
Reply with quote
Adsibearsawsome wrote:
I think she means how much crew should she have of each rather than knowing she needs to increase her crew as a general statement.

Fixed.


Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:21 pm
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:04 pm
Posts: 77
Reply with quote
Updating

Image
Image
Image
Image

_________________
"Oatmeal, Are you crazy?!" - Pinkie Pie


Wed Mar 27, 2013 5:02 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:40 pm
Posts: 28
Reply with quote
For comparison. Rank 208 Konqul Fixer

Attack: 3437
Defense: 4759
Hull: 12393
Shield: 1698
Max Energy (w/out relays atm): 2827
Ship Size: 1826 (Heavy Levi)
Production: Yours is better
Crew: I have more Engineers, You have more Tacs


Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:25 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 20 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.