View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:06 pm



Reply to topic  [ 248 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 13  Next
 Need some scan numbers 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am
Posts: 3472
Reply with quote
Littlefluffy wrote:
Scanning Power: 18116
Planets Discovered: 1292


wiki updated:

http://galaxylegion.com/wiki/index.php/ ... s_Per_Scan

also added credits for the pilots who provided the scan info.

_________________
Rank 3950 Litheor Governor 100% DCR r385-r2200 GL Marauder #26
_____________Image
PvP leaderboards: 70212 raids: #1; 40852 kills: #1; 96377 hacks: #3;


Sat Dec 08, 2012 1:08 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:47 pm
Posts: 1513
Reply with quote
After 2 hrs of re-arranging scan mods and scanning and 3050 energy spent (though I'm far from finished) here are my initial results.

I started with 181 planets in my database. I couldn't get down to just my own planets because a couple had vortex deflectors, 1 was exotica :roll:, and one had an xrp warp inhibitor (please +1 my thread here http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=31521 )

Scan . . Planets
1302 . . 182
1320 . . 183
1330 . . 184
1340 . . 185
1355 . . 186
1360 . . 187
1380 . . 188
1390 . . 189
1400 . . 190
1410 . . 191
1420 . . 192
1430 . . 193
1440 . . 194
1455 . . 195
1465 . . 196
1480 . . 197
1490 . . 198
1500 . . 199
1510 . . 200
1520 . . 201
1535 . . 202
1540 . . 203
1559 . . 204
1560 . . 205
1580 . . 206
1590 . . 207
1600 . . 208
1615 . . 209
1620 . . 210
1640 . . 211
1650 . . 212
1660 . . 213
1670 . . 214
1680 . . 215
1698 . . 216
1700 . . 217


Increasing by 5 in between scans, I only encountered 2x where I could scan more than 1 planet (in which cases I purged 1 and lowered scan a bit to find the exact number - those cases were 1559 and 1698 and I started at 1302).

_________________
XxDarthDexterxX wrote:
You deserve a cookie, and earn yourself one cookie point. :mrgreen:


Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:15 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:12 pm
Posts: 37
Reply with quote
Scanning Power: 4714
Planets Discovered: 445 - greyed out

_________________
Image


Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:55 pm
Profile

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:47 pm
Posts: 1513
Reply with quote
A couple more hours of of arranging and re-arranging scan mods and scanning and 7505 MORE energy and here are some more results. (Again, please +1 my thread here http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=31521 )

Scan . . Planets
1720 . . 218
1725 . . 219
1740 . . 220
1755 . . 221
1760 . . 222
1780 . . 223
1785 . . 224
1800 . . 225
1815 . . 226
1820 . . 227
1840 . . 228
1845 . . 229
1860 . . 230
1875 . . 231
1880 . . 232
1900 . . 233
1905 . . 234
1920 . . 235
1935 . . 236
1940 . . 237
1960 . . 238
1965 . . 239
1980 . . 240
1995 . . 241
2000 . . 242
2020 . . 243
2025 . . 244
2040 . . 245
2055 . . 246
2060 . . 247
2080 . . 248
2090 . . 249
2100 . . 250
2119 . . 251
2120 . . 252
2140 . . 253
2150 . . 254
2160 . . 255
2180 . . 256
2185 . . 257
2200 . . 258
2215 . . 259
2220 . . 260
2240 . . 261
2250 . . 262
2260 . . 263
2280 . . 264
2285 . . 265
2300 . . 266
2315 . . 267
2320 . . 268
2340 . . 269
2350 . . 270
2360 . . 271
2380 . . 272
2385 . . 273
2400 . . 274
2418 . . 275
2420 . . 276
2440 . . 277
2450 . . 278
2460 . . 279
2480 . . 280
2485 . . 281
2500 . . 282
2519 . .
2520 . . 283, 284


Again, I was increasing by 5 in between scans, and again I encountered 2x where I could scan more than 1 planet (in which cases I purged 1 and lowered scan a bit to find the exact number - those cases were scan 2119 and scan 2418).

Another oddity was my last scan for the day (cause I'm tired of looking at these horrible planets!) at scan 2520. At scan 2519 the button was grayed out, but scan 2520 allowed me to scan planets 283 and 284, so the required scan for 283 must be something like 2519.xxx but I haven't been using any scan buffs (to keep it easy to figure my scan mods, etc.) so can't be sure on that one.

I'll be doing more tomorrow if anyone can start trying to figure out the equation, that'd be nice :)

_________________
XxDarthDexterxX wrote:
You deserve a cookie, and earn yourself one cookie point. :mrgreen:


Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:02 pm
Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:56 pm
Posts: 1403
Reply with quote
That's very interesting.

_________________
Image
Check out my music!
http://www.soundcloud.com/silverstitchedcrow


Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:31 am
Profile WWW

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:54 am
Posts: 1208
Reply with quote
good list

_________________
Image


Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:42 am
Profile

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:42 am
Posts: 779
Reply with quote
Hope this helps you find your equation.
Image

I can do a graph between scan values of, say, 0 and 3000 to give you a better detailed look at that curved region.

_________________
Image


Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:29 pm
Profile

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:47 pm
Posts: 1513
Reply with quote
Here's another run for today. I'm thinking that I may jump up to around 5k and continue scanning from there as I believe we have enough data for this segment or the scale, but that won't be till tomorrow, so if anyone has a compelling reason not to do that, let me know. (Only 5,420 energy used this time and again, please +1 my thread here http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=31521 )

Scan . . Planets
2540 . . 285
2555 . . 286
2560 . . 287
2580 . . 288
2595 . . 289
2600 . . 290
2620 . . 291
2630 . . 292
2640 . . 293
2660 . . 294
2665 . . 295
2680 . . 296
2699 . . 297
2700 . . 298
2720 . . 299
2735 . . 300
2740 . . 301
2760 . . 302
2775 . . 303
2780 . . 304
2800 . . 305
2810 . . 306
2820 . . 307
2840 . . 308
2850 . . 309
2860 . . 310
2880 . . 311
2885 . . 312
2900 . . 313
2920 . . 314
2925 . . 315
2940 . . 316
2959 . .
2960 . . 317, 318
2980 . . 319
2999 . . 320
3000 . . 321
3020 . . 322
3039 . . 323
3040 . . 324
3060 . . 325
3079 . . 326
3080 . . 327
3100 . . 328
3119 . . 329
3120 . . 330


As before, I was increasing by 5 in between scans, and like before I encountered 5x where I could scan more than 1 planet (in which cases I purged 1 and lowered scan a bit to find the exact number - those cases were scan 2699, 2999, 3039, 3079, and scan 3119). This is only important in that there won't be deviation in these scan numbers, whereas (for example) planet 328 may have been found with scan 3096, 3097, 3098, 3099, or 3100.

like my last post, I found that similar % anomaly at scan 2959. The button was gray but 2960 allowed me to scan planets 317 and 318. So (like 283) the required scan for 317 must be something like 2959.xxx but I haven't been using any scan buffs (to keep it easy to figure my scan mods, etc.) so can't be sure on that one.

Also, thanks for the scatterplot.

_________________
XxDarthDexterxX wrote:
You deserve a cookie, and earn yourself one cookie point. :mrgreen:


Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:32 pm
Profile

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:13 am
Posts: 897
Reply with quote
scan 7671 grey out at 645 planets

_________________
Image


Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:49 pm
Profile

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:42 am
Posts: 779
Reply with quote
In response to the wiki; there are a few numbers in the first chunk of the list (Idk if there are later on) where two scan numbers are provided for the same number of planets. (I think 105 repeats with two scan values with differ by less than 10). I think that the ultimate goal should be 1 box for every 'Max no. of planets' (I.E. 1..n, n being the max number of planets possible to scan) and the lowest scan value needed to scan that many planets.

I.E.

Min Scan | Max Planets

1 | 1
5 | 2
10 | 3

And so on.... (These are probably incorrect values, for the record; I just pulled arbitrary numbers out of the air).

_________________
Image


Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:51 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am
Posts: 3472
Reply with quote
Silens wrote:
In response to the wiki; there are a few numbers in the first chunk of the list (Idk if there are later on) where two scan numbers are provided for the same number of planets. (I think 105 repeats with two scan values with differ by less than 10). I think that the ultimate goal should be 1 box for every 'Max no. of planets' (I.E. 1..n, n being the max number of planets possible to scan) and the lowest scan value needed to scan that many planets.


nope, the ultimate goal is to eliminate the table altogether once we come up with the equation that describes the curve. [i'm assuming that was ODragon's intention when he started the table]. the more data points for that right now, the better.

the other thing to try after that is to see if we can get a parallel curve for the 'good' scan line and that will cover the majority of queries about planetary scanning.

[will update the wiki with the latest points tonight - was too tuckered last nite]

_________________
Rank 3950 Litheor Governor 100% DCR r385-r2200 GL Marauder #26
_____________Image
PvP leaderboards: 70212 raids: #1; 40852 kills: #1; 96377 hacks: #3;


Wed Dec 12, 2012 2:16 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:42 am
Posts: 779
Reply with quote
Dan might've configured the scanning to give you two different equations for scan values though (one equation between, say, 0 and 2000 and then another for everything else). The graph doesn't look like a consistent curve; it might even be discontinuous.

_________________
Image


Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:27 pm
Profile

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:47 pm
Posts: 1513
Reply with quote
So I did my run a bit differently today. After doing a bit from where I left off I jumped a bit and did about 5-10 scans by 5s then jumped about 300-500 scan and did another set of 5-10 scans so we could get a bit more information as the curve gets higher. I also found a lower scan requirement for 473 planets than the 5200 scan posted elsewhere (I got 473 planets at 5119 scan). Also 11,265 energy used through this one (good thing I've got some spare cubes and tri's :P )

Scan . . Planets
3140 . . 331
3155 . . 332
3160 . . 333
3180 . . 334
3195 . . 335
3200 . . 336
3220 . . 337
3235 . . 338
3240 . . 339
3260 . . 340
3275 . . 341
3280 . . 342
3300 . . 343
3319 . . 344
3320 . . 345
3340 . . 346
3359 . . 347
3360 . . 348
3380 . . 349

4070 . . 399
4080 . . 400
4095 . . 401
4100 . . 402
4120 . . 403
4139 . . 404
4140 . . 405
4160 . . 406
4180 . . 407
4190 . . 408
4205 . . 409

4460 . . 427
4470 . . 428
4480 . . 429
4500 . . 430
4519 . . 431
4520 . . 432

5030 . . 467
5040 . . 468
5060 . . 469
5065 . . 470
5080 . . 471
5100 . . 472
5119 . . 473
5120 . . 474

And I finally found some planets I could actually colonize/invade!

_________________
XxDarthDexterxX wrote:
You deserve a cookie, and earn yourself one cookie point. :mrgreen:


Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:01 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:49 pm
Posts: 8964
Reply with quote
Actually, aside from the very low (>~2000) and those couple burps at ~11k, it looks like a direct linear relationship... But then I haven't had my coffee yet...

_________________
Ranks 400+ Join us in exploring..
ImageImage

[20:40] Wredz: just hacked a massive extremely rich minting planet from someone.. thats the best planet i ever hacked
[20:43] DarthFlagitious: is it spearmint or peppermint?


Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:03 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 1529
Reply with quote
no buff scan 8010
696 planets scanned Planet scan button greyed out.


Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:18 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 1529
Reply with quote
also I don't think you want to be explorer when you do these too .. right?


Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:20 pm
Profile

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:42 am
Posts: 779
Reply with quote
Darth Flagitious wrote:
Actually, aside from the very low (>~2000 I'm presuming you mean <~2000 here, not greater than 2000.) and those couple burps at ~11k, it looks like a direct linear relationship... But then I haven't had my coffee yet...


The <~2000 was my point... There's a curve between 0 and 2000 and a linear relationship from there-on. This possibly represents two different equations being used (Which would be backed up by a discontinuity).

_________________
Image


Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:37 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:49 pm
Posts: 8964
Reply with quote
Yeah... ALWAYS click the wrong one.... :roll:

_________________
Ranks 400+ Join us in exploring..
ImageImage

[20:40] Wredz: just hacked a massive extremely rich minting planet from someone.. thats the best planet i ever hacked
[20:43] DarthFlagitious: is it spearmint or peppermint?


Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:41 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:42 am
Posts: 779
Reply with quote
We're missing loads of values for scans 1 > ~500

We really need these, I think; more important than gettings loads of high scan values.

_________________
Image


Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:01 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:44 pm
Posts: 1997
Location: Causing chaos somewhere
Reply with quote
Silens wrote:
We're missing loads of values for scans 1 < ~500

We really need these, I think; more important than gettings loads of high scan values.

fixed it :)

_________________
Image
Image
Meow chika meow meow!!
Stark Tech Inside


Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:45 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 248 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 13  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.