Author |
Message |
TimeManipulator
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:13 pm Posts: 2711 Location: Somewhere trying to find a way to increase the use of Time Manipulators.
|
Rank 470 Konqul Excavator
40.11 - Mining 38.7 - Research 57.2 - Artifact
1 Planet Slot Open (always)
_________________ Why the $%&% are you looking at my signature for...?
|
Thu May 09, 2013 12:20 pm |
|
|
elerian
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:25 am Posts: 2360 Location: New York
|
elerian wrote: resources : 122.89 artifacts : 64.02 rank 474 resources : 153.5 artifacts : 71.82 now thats an increase far higher than I had though it would be
_________________
|
Thu May 09, 2013 2:04 pm |
|
|
IYCE327
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 10:27 am Posts: 86
|
81.1353135314, total resource. 23.0748074807 artifact 909 rank Planets Occupied 201 909/4=227.+1=228 27 open planet slots
|
Thu May 09, 2013 3:06 pm |
|
|
senatorhung
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am Posts: 3472
|
_________________Rank 3950 Litheor Governor 100% DCR r385-r2200 GL Marauder #26 _____________ PvP leaderboards: 70212 raids: #1; 40852 kills: #1; 96377 hacks: #3;
|
Thu May 16, 2013 8:43 pm |
|
|
Kara Thrace
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:48 pm Posts: 539 Location: The underside of your ship
|
Kara Thrace Rank 293 Zolazin Sab
mining: 7641-- 26.1 arti: 10161-- 34.7 research: 8970-- 30.6
total resources: 91.3
3 planet slots open
_________________You're the hero but I'm in charge.
Last edited by Kara Thrace on Thu May 16, 2013 11:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Thu May 16, 2013 9:14 pm |
|
|
sumwunn
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:03 pm Posts: 220
|
TimeManipulator wrote: Rank 470 Konqul Excavator
40.11 - Mining 38.7 - Research 57.2 - Artifact
1 Planet Slot Open (always) Do spy probe resources not work or have you lost a lot of planets lately? I just used one on you and at rank 483 it shows you at only 42.7 artifact/rank ratio, 29.0 mineral/rank and you cleared your research before I copied it down so I couldn't check that.
_________________6 mins ago From: Concerto Once Again Legion Alerted. Badging is generally regarded as okay once a week. Not per day.
|
Thu May 16, 2013 10:15 pm |
|
|
f3ar3dlegend
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:18 pm Posts: 549
|
Rank 514:
9528 minerals/hour = 18.54 minerals/rank 20322 artifacts/hour = 39.54 artifacts/rank 11422 research/hour = 22.22 research/rank
_________________
|
Thu May 16, 2013 10:35 pm |
|
|
SuperStar
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:46 am Posts: 285 Location: NOT on Spotify
|
Rank 1242
42916 Mineral points/hr = 34.55 MP/rank 78249 Artifact points/hr = 63.00 AP/rank 59012 Research points/hr = 47.51 RP/rank
Total production = 180177 points/hr = 145.07 points/rank
5 planet slots open
_________________#1 in GL... and in your heartTop 50 in BattlesTop 10 in Kills, Raids, Hacks and Medal PointsOfficer in Empire of the Sun
|
Thu May 16, 2013 11:05 pm |
|
|
senatorhung
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am Posts: 3472
|
alright, the single chart was getting mighty crowded, so i have split the data into 2 ... the first below 1k rank, and the other above 1k rank. i think most people can figure out where they are at and how they compare now, so i don't expect to update these charts any further.
_________________Rank 3950 Litheor Governor 100% DCR r385-r2200 GL Marauder #26 _____________ PvP leaderboards: 70212 raids: #1; 40852 kills: #1; 96377 hacks: #3;
|
Fri May 24, 2013 12:01 pm |
|
|
Wolfy Minion
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:16 am Posts: 2737
|
Wolfy Minion wrote: My current is now: rank 1705 Art: 69.6 Total: 134.97 rank 1890 Art: 76.75 Total: 149.4 162 open slots
_________________
|
Fri May 24, 2013 1:36 pm |
|
|
JohnMcAuley
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:36 am Posts: 600
|
Thankfully(!) this isn't a marker of ship stats, which is determined by the total AP collected, even as a comparison of combating ships it's misleading (on the BT I can target ships 800 ranks below me and wars just disregard rank outright). Having 132,000 AP/hr (rather than a statistic of 63.1 AP/rank) means that my ship, despite only being 440 days old, can stand up to all but a couple of often-referred to players.
|
Fri May 24, 2013 1:54 pm |
|
|
Wolfy Minion
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:16 am Posts: 2737
|
Deleted on request by post author
_________________
|
Fri May 24, 2013 6:32 pm |
|
|
JohnMcAuley
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:36 am Posts: 600
|
Wolfy Minion wrote: Deleted on request by post author Of course, I'm sure no one would have taken this thread seriously... it's not like it's listed in 'Strategy', with every post collated and graphically displayed
|
Fri May 24, 2013 6:51 pm |
|
|
Wolfy Minion
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:16 am Posts: 2737
|
No one else tried to justify their scores by saying it was a pointless statistic.
_________________
|
Fri May 24, 2013 6:53 pm |
|
|
JohnMcAuley
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:36 am Posts: 600
|
Wolfy Minion wrote: No one else tried to justify their scores by saying it was a pointless statistic. I hope I don't need to explain how that isn't proof against the comment (not to mention how you completely overlooked evidence for)... Go troll someone else
|
Fri May 24, 2013 7:12 pm |
|
|
Wolfy Minion
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:16 am Posts: 2737
|
I am not trolling, I want you to stop trying to ruin everyone's else fun by pointing out the fact it is a pointless stat, because yours is low. Whether or not people take it serious is up to them, the fact you did and had to justify your shortcomings because it is pathetic. If any others did take it seriously they just went in game and tried to improve their score You just tried to make yourself above it by saying it doesn't matter, but if it really didn't matter you wouldn't have needed to comment and could just accept your style of play results in a lower score and moved on.
_________________
|
Fri May 24, 2013 7:29 pm |
|
|
JohnMcAuley
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:36 am Posts: 600
|
Wolfy Minion wrote: I am not trolling, I want you to stop trying to ruin everyone's else fun by pointing out the fact it is a pointless stat, because yours is low. Whether or not people take it serious is up to them, the fact you did and had to justify your shortcomings because it is pathetic. If any others did take it seriously they just went in game and tried to improve their score You just tried to make yourself above it by saying it doesn't matter, but if it really didn't matter you wouldn't have needed to comment and could just accept your style of play results in a lower score and moved on. I am pointing out that others shouldn't take it seriously, which clearly many *cough cough* do, because it is not the determinant of ship strength, plenty could easily be misled, making the maximising of this stat their main aim (like many do with the Planet Quality Index), when it should be total AP collected. Stating 'I do not value this statistic' in the thread does not mean I take it seriously, lol.
|
Fri May 24, 2013 8:02 pm |
|
|
Peticks
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:44 pm Posts: 1997 Location: Causing chaos somewhere
|
Artifact 8638 - 42.14 Mining 1585 - 7.73 Research 5459 - 26.63 Ranked 205 2 slots open Artifact 42.14 Resources 76.5 Not too bad
_________________Meow chika meow meow!!Stark Tech Inside
|
Fri May 24, 2013 8:12 pm |
|
|
Atlas
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:00 am Posts: 1154
|
Atlas wrote: Ressource: 81.4 Artifact: 41.1 Rank 833 Planet slot open: 28 Artifact/rank : 45.47 Resource/rank : 85.19
|
Fri May 24, 2013 9:27 pm |
|
|
Fabulon
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:18 pm Posts: 604
|
JohnMcAuley wrote: Wolfy Minion wrote: I am not trolling, I want you to stop trying to ruin everyone's else fun by pointing out the fact it is a pointless stat, because yours is low. Whether or not people take it serious is up to them, the fact you did and had to justify your shortcomings because it is pathetic. If any others did take it seriously they just went in game and tried to improve their score You just tried to make yourself above it by saying it doesn't matter, but if it really didn't matter you wouldn't have needed to comment and could just accept your style of play results in a lower score and moved on. I am pointing out that others shouldn't take it seriously, which clearly many *cough cough* do, because it is not the determinant of ship strength, plenty could easily be misled, making the maximising of this stat their main aim (like many do with the Planet Quality Index), when it should be total AP collected. Stating 'I do not value this statistic' in the thread does not mean I take it seriously, lol. Yes, it is a little odd how someone who has coughing fits could criticise someone else's sneeze
_________________Once Fabulon, now known as Thebloodynine Most exasperated leader at Project Anarchy. Don't talk to me till the caffeine hit is in Have given up caffeine- probably best just not to talk to me
|
Fri May 24, 2013 11:59 pm |
|
|
|