Galaxy Legion Forum http://galaxylegion.com/forum/ |
|
Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top GL Killers http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=42464 |
Page 2 of 3 |
Author: | senatorhung [ Sat Aug 01, 2015 10:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
CapitainePaul wrote: Why are 11 and 12 there and not myself ? I am top 50 in all 3 stats top 5 in medal points (only missing 5 year medals). uh ... do you see the name of the topic ? go ahead and scroll up .. i will wait. so once you can get to the top 10 in kills ... so that your information can be gathered easily ... then you can be included via the kills leaderboard. as for other inclusions: Wrath was included both times since he is the highest.ranked legion member in AU where i am at. TBP was included in the previous one as a long.time slow ranker and also as a member of AU. while he is still playing ... i thought i would shuffle things up by bringing in DarkMar who is on my friends list from previous trades (and is a frequent forum contributor). if i were you, i would think about checking that ego ... it's no wonder you can not find a decent legion to take you in. |
Author: | juiceman [ Sun Aug 02, 2015 4:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
ba-zing? |
Author: | ignatnic [ Thu Aug 06, 2015 2:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
do some number crunching and tell me how to achieve 300+ scans per day, I need to get there |
Author: | Peticks [ Thu Aug 06, 2015 2:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
CapitainePaul wrote: Why are 11 and 12 there and not myself ? I am top 50 in all 3 stats top 5 in medal points (only missing 5 year medals). viewtopic.php?f=7&t=41877&hilit=Elite&start=0 your included in this one. if you get the guts to go up to the top 10 in kills, perma alerting you to all the guys who have a bone to pick with ya then have at it and maybe you'll get included XP |
Author: | Redneck_King_of_Funk [ Thu Aug 06, 2015 3:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
ignatnic wrote: do some number crunching and tell me how to achieve 300+ scans per day, I need to get there *eye roll* Maybe start by doing more than 8 a day? |
Author: | senatorhung [ Thu Aug 06, 2015 4:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
ignatnic wrote: do some number crunching and tell me how to achieve 300+ scans per day, I need to get there i *did* the number crunching already (or at least my spreadsheet did). as for how ... you'll have to consult with topper ... but my guess is that he runs the purger mission 1000 times .. then does his scan run of 500 planets ... purges 99% of them .. and scans for another 500 planets .. purges 99% of them and then scans another 500 planets. that is 1500 is one scan session. |
Author: | 0702 [ Fri Aug 07, 2015 2:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
ignatnic wrote: do some number crunching and tell me how to achieve 300+ scans per day, I need to get there Talk to your leader, he can explain to you how to do 400+ per day, not 300+ P.S. Senator is 100% correct but for ignatnic hmmmm. Not sure if that's a good explanation |
Author: | ignatnic [ Sat Aug 08, 2015 12:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
I think a better question is the idea of scanning to grey which is what people do to achieve that. It strikes me as a waste of e to scan past poof but it seems like many prefer that strategy |
Author: | ignatnic [ Sat Aug 08, 2015 8:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
My main takeaway is scan more scan more scan more |
Author: | senatorhung [ Sat Aug 08, 2015 11:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
ignatnic wrote: I think a better question is the idea of scanning to grey which is what people do to achieve that. It strikes me as a waste of e to scan past poof but it seems like many prefer that strategy uh ... some players might need to scan to grey .. but Topper doesn't. he can just do a mini.scan run of 100 ... purge 100 ... scan 100 .. purge 100 etc. as long as his EM holds out. i try to make my scan runs do multiple duty ... so a legion mission scan task ... or one of the recent dailys .. restocking NSX ambers and so on. scanning to grey might happen then .. but only if the secondary task is not finished first (or the hour for the NSX ability). scan runs always scheduled for wed / sat to squeeze the most benefit out of the limited supply of stryll seekers. |
Author: | kirkeastment [ Sat Aug 08, 2015 11:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
senatorhung wrote: ignatnic wrote: I think a better question is the idea of scanning to grey which is what people do to achieve that. It strikes me as a waste of e to scan past poof but it seems like many prefer that strategy uh ... some players might need to scan to grey .. but Topper doesn't. he can just do a mini.scan run of 100 ... purge 100 ... scan 100 .. purge 100 etc. as long as his EM holds out. i try to make my scan runs do multiple duty ... so a legion mission scan task ... or one of the recent dailys .. restocking NSX ambers and so on. scanning to grey might happen then .. but only if the secondary task is not finished first (or the hour for the NSX ability). scan runs always scheduled for wed / sat to squeeze the most benefit out of the limited supply of stryll seekers. ummmm Planets Found 1313 that's damn near grey without an explorer bonus, so he almost certainly is scanning to grey(or the very least he's scanning with a poor-very poor rating if he'd doing the 100 purge and 100 scan you suggest) you can be assured of that nobody gets those sort of scan numbers without scanning to grey 99% of the time, of that you can rest assured. |
Author: | senatorhung [ Sun Aug 09, 2015 12:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
kirkeastment wrote: senatorhung wrote: ignatnic wrote: I think a better question is the idea of scanning to grey which is what people do to achieve that. It strikes me as a waste of e to scan past poof but it seems like many prefer that strategy uh ... some players might need to scan to grey .. but Topper doesn't. he can just do a mini.scan run of 100 ... purge 100 ... scan 100 .. purge 100 etc. as long as his EM holds out. i try to make my scan runs do multiple duty ... so a legion mission scan task ... or one of the recent dailys .. restocking NSX ambers and so on. scanning to grey might happen then .. but only if the secondary task is not finished first (or the hour for the NSX ability). scan runs always scheduled for wed / sat to squeeze the most benefit out of the limited supply of stryll seekers. ummmm Planets Found 1313 that's damn near grey without an explorer bonus, so he almost certainly is scanning to grey(or the very least he's scanning with a poor-very poor rating if he'd doing the 100 purge and 100 scan you suggest) you can be assured of that nobody gets those sort of scan numbers without scanning to grey 99% of the time, of that you can rest assured. you need to start *reading* more and *skimming* less. i never said Topper didn't ever scan to grey ... just that he doesn't NEED to. 1313 planets goes to grey around 18650 scan .. a non.hacker non.litheor non.explorer can still get 21330 scan with only the stryll seeker limited buff. that excludes litheoria ... datastream compiler .. explorer ... roathir listening post. so around 1450 planets. definitely in the poor to very poor zone .. but not to grey. the only reason he would scan to grey is to make the most efficient use of limited scan buffs .. interrupting a scan session to purge a bunch of planets wastes some of that scan power. |
Author: | Argos [ Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
Hats off to you for all this number crunching and attention to detail, definitely gives clear indicators to what needs to be done to get up on the pvp lists. Gotta admit im a little disturbed by the amount of scanning that Topper gets through in a single day, every day :S |
Author: | 0702 [ Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
Thanks for the update. Go Funky! |
Author: | Redneck_King_of_Funk [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 2:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
Was a goal to make this list when i started game in December 2013. Thanks Senator. |
Author: | senatorhung [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 6:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
i feel a great disturbance in the force ... Quote: Galaxy Top Players - Kills 1. Ignatnic Uldrinan Hacker 20618 2. Senatorhung Mylarai Explorer 15153 3. Topper Harley Litheor Explorer 15152 |
Author: | CapitainePaul [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 5:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top10 Killers |
I cannot wait for an update with me finally in it. |
Author: | CapitainePaul [ Sat Mar 11, 2017 5:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Senatorhung's Analysis: Profiles of Top15 Killers (was Top10 |
Fascinating. |
Page 2 of 3 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |