Galaxy Legion Forum
http://galaxylegion.com/forum/

Question.
http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=9888		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  strm avenger [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 4:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Question.
So. I just hit the Insane reputation. At rank 45, I'm pretty much alone in my rep. This makes me wonder if I've done something wrong and whether I should focus on missions for a while... my stats:

StrmAvenger
Rank 45 Konqul Fixer
Galactic Coalition (16)
Combat Reputation: Insane


Battles 2418 (Veteran)
Player Kills 366
Deaths from Players 43
Kills:Deaths Ratio: 8.5:1
Non-Player Kills 24
Planets Found 85
Planets Occupied 10
Planets Captured 3
Missions Completed 128
Scans Performed 127
Successful Hacks 15
Successful Raids 8

Size Class Light Cruiser
Weapons Heavy Graviton Shearer x2, Dominion Cannon x4 (just wrapping up Disruptor Cannons)
Energy Omicron Injector
Sensors AI Supercomputer
Hull Merged Microgel Armor x4
Shields Harmonic Resonator
Cloaking EM Absorbant Panels - Mark III, EM Absorbant Panels
Defenses Inertial Canceler - Mark III

Space: 230 / 230
Attack: 509
Defense: 179
Hull: 1105
Shield 35
Energy 100
Scan: 6
Cloak: 81
Cargo: 54 / 90
Upkeep: 284.9K
Konqul: Attack +20%
Fixer: Hull +30%

Please do not tell me to invest in energy. I have that under control. (slow ranking)
Author:  Kalos [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 4:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
you haven't done anything wrong, other than maybe scare everyone around your rank.
Author:  thunderbolta [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
Nice job on the Insane rep. Your not doing anything wrong! It's what are they doing wrong.

Battles 4647 (Champion) (More than you)
Player Kills 292 (Less than you)
Deaths from Players 73 (More than you)
Non-Player Kills 130 (More than you. Good few elites.)
Planets Found 157
Planets Occupied 26
Planets Captured 12
Missions Completed 286
Scans Performed 229
Successful Hacks 72
Successful Raids 45
Author:  thunderbolta [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
Kalos wrote:
other than maybe scare everyone around your rank.


Lol at this.
Author:  DariousTheDark [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
Player Kills 366
Deaths from Players 43
Kills:Deaths Ratio: 8.5:1

Kills - Deaths Reputation
-50 or fewer Laughable
-40 or fewer Feeble
-30 or fewer Weak
-20 or fewer Passive
-19 to 10 Balanced
11 to 20 Harmful
21 to 40 Dangerous
41 to 80 Deadly
81 to 160 Menacing
161 to 320 Savage
321+ Insane

Your kills vs your deaths is what sets it.
If you had 325 kills and 20 deaths, you would be at savage.

Don't be fooled by the Combat Reputation.
There are some that just don't do PvP, and battle the NPCs
Those are deadlier with a Laughable rep more than the Insanes.
Author:  spyder [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
Also beware of hackers. they may appear to be weak, but they can be far more annoying than others because they'll just mine your research points.
Author:  thunderbolta [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
Hackers can only hack once every 15mins (TMs are scarce at rank 45... they are coveted at 100...) so you don't have to worry too much about hackers. Your rep should scare them away. With only a 'Savage' rep I rarely get disabled, or even hit, despite running 5 cloak.

You do need to pay attention to Darious though. He makes an excellent point...
Author:  spyder [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
thunderbolta wrote:
Hackers can only hack once every 15mins (TMs are scarce at rank 45... they are coveted at 100...) so you don't have to worry too much about hackers. Your rep should scare them away. With only a 'Savage' rep I rarely get disabled, or even hit, despite running 5 cloak.

You do need to pay attention to Darious though. He makes an excellent point...


I TARGET people with savage reputations first, because they usually have minimal hack defence :)
Author:  strm avenger [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
DariousTheDark wrote:
Player Kills 366
Deaths from Players 43
Kills:Deaths Ratio: 8.5:1

Kills - Deaths Reputation
-50 or fewer Laughable
-40 or fewer Feeble
-30 or fewer Weak
-20 or fewer Passive
-19 to 10 Balanced
11 to 20 Harmful
21 to 40 Dangerous
41 to 80 Deadly
81 to 160 Menacing
161 to 320 Savage
321+ Insane

Your kills vs your deaths is what sets it.
If you had 325 kills and 20 deaths, you would be at savage.


I know. I've been counting down the kills. :D The ratio was just added because I felt like it.

spyder wrote:
Also beware of hackers. they may appear to be weak, but they can be far more annoying than others because they'll just mine your research points.


Do you choose the guy who's rep is veteran/insane to hack? Besides. If they do, I'll disable them until they fall off of my newsfeed.
Author:  spyder [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
I usually go for savage/deadly/dangerous, those sorts - they focus on too much on attack and not enough on scans/cloak. I usually leave insane alone because they've probably realised the importance of defence too (which a lot of the people who target me don't realise - I had 3 attacks while offline, and survived with over half my hull. I returned the favour, as it was a legion alert).
Author:  strm avenger [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
spyder wrote:
I usually go for savage/deadly/dangerous, those sorts - they focus on too much on attack and not enough on scans/cloak. I usually leave insane alone because they've probably realised the importance of defence too (which a lot of the people who target me don't realise - I had 3 attacks while offline, and survived with over half my hull. I returned the favour, as it was a legion alert).


I carry 2 cannon, 1 defense. +4 dominions. Giving me 509 attack and 179 defense.
Author:  spyder [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
you're above average for your rank. If I were you, I'd get something like the Stryll transponder, just for easy scan and defence. Scan prevents hacks.
Author:  strm avenger [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
spyder wrote:
you're above average for your rank. If I were you, I'd get something like the Stryll transponder, just for easy scan and defence. Scan prevents hacks.


You realise each transponder would take me 3 weeks?
Author:  spyder [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
3 Weeks? They took me 1 week to get both, at rank 25. Without relays.
There again, I only hacked back then, so I wasn't blowing energy on PvP or PvE
Author:  strm avenger [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
spyder wrote:
3 Weeks? They took me 1 week to get both, at rank 25. Without relays.
There again, I only hacked back then, so I wasn't blowing energy on PvP or PvE


100 energy = 4 steps per day.
80 steps = 20 days.
Author:  Joshball98 [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
strm avenger wrote:
spyder wrote:
3 Weeks? They took me 1 week to get both, at rank 25. Without relays.
There again, I only hacked back then, so I wasn't blowing energy on PvP or PvE


100 energy = 4 steps per day.
80 steps = 20 days.

Wow I finished it real easy. If you get 100 energy a day you really need to research new cores. ( Even if you slow rank invest in new cores and dont add them or add them without relays so you dont cap and can do missions more. )
I get around 936 energy a day. With relays
Author:  spyder [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
Energy recharges faster than 100/day. The base rate is 20/hour.
25*80 = 2000 energy/transponder.

2000/20 = 100 hours, which is just over 4 days each.
Install relays while you're online, and leveling and daily rewards, and you'll have enough energy in no time.
Author:  strm avenger [ Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
spyder wrote:
Energy recharges faster than 100/day. The base rate is 20/hour.
25*80 = 2000 energy/transponder.

2000/20 = 100 hours, which is just over 4 days each.
Install relays while you're online, and leveling and daily rewards, and you'll have enough energy in no time.


My max energy is 100.
I can only get on once during the week.
Relays? Pah. I only have +1s.
I guess you have a point with the leveling and daily rewards... lets see. It takes me 5 days to rank up (assuming no refills) and that would speed up if I started doing the mission. As a slow ranker I try not to rank too quickly, else I will become average on tech. (I get a 2:1 xp ratio most of the time.)

spyder wrote:
I usually go for savage/deadly/dangerous, those sorts - they focus on too much on attack and not enough on scans/cloak. I usually leave insane alone because they've probably realised the importance of defence too (which a lot of the people who target me don't realise - I had 3 attacks while offline, and survived with over half my hull. I returned the favour, as it was a legion alert).


Lol, the number of people with deadly/menacing reps and no defense means I often target them too.
Author:  Kalos [ Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
spyder wrote:
3 Weeks? They took me 1 week to get both, at rank 25. Without relays.
There again, I only hacked back then, so I wasn't blowing energy on PvP or PvE



PvE isn't wasting energy, it's one of the best things in the game.
Author:  strm avenger [ Sat Jul 16, 2011 7:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Question.
So... now that I have finished disruptor cannons and my attack is up to 583, should I go for Nanospheres, Microwarps, or Quantum Devastators?
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/