View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:02 am



Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
 Qualms with how % base shipments are calculated 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:11 am
Posts: 899
Location: Turn Around
Reply with quote
How come former members' upgrade percentage are added to only current members'? This doesnt make sense and it should be changed so that the former members' upgrade percentage should be split evenly between all members.

_________________
Image
Image


Sat Sep 26, 2020 6:20 pm
Profile

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2016 11:02 am
Posts: 59
Reply with quote
I for one dont understand what you posted. Care to elaborate?


Sun Sep 27, 2020 7:05 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am
Posts: 3473
Reply with quote
Cut wrote:
I for one dont understand what you posted. Care to elaborate?


if you look at the upgrades to the base .. everyone, including former members, are assigned a % based on their total contributions (which equate ctp and EM at the same ratio for some strange reason known only to Dan). when former members (or visitors paid to make massive energy donations) depart .. they still keep their percentage .. so if the base output is assigned based on percentage contribution, a bunch of base production is lost to those who are no longer members. the OP seems to want that re.apportioned.

i think it's fair the way it is. if someone else built the base, but is no longer there, the fact that remaining members can't re.apportion the % contribution is part of the appeal / opportunity cost. so with the big dogs out of the outhouse, keeping the base distribution divided evenly between all members is the only way to get maximum base output. doing it the OP's way, means that a lvl 8 base could give full production to a lowbie rank at 100% contribution .. which would just incentivize more alt.cheating.

_________________
Rank 3950 Litheor Governor 100% DCR r385-r2200 GL Marauder #26
_____________Image
PvP leaderboards: 70212 raids: #1; 40852 kills: #1; 96377 hacks: #3;


Sun Sep 27, 2020 9:31 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:11 am
Posts: 899
Location: Turn Around
Reply with quote
senatorhung wrote:
Cut wrote:
I for one dont understand what you posted. Care to elaborate?


if you look at the upgrades to the base .. everyone, including former members, are assigned a % based on their total contributions (which equate ctp and EM at the same ratio for some strange reason known only to Dan). when former members (or visitors paid to make massive energy donations) depart .. they still keep their percentage .. so if the base output is assigned based on percentage contribution, a bunch of base production is lost to those who are no longer members. the OP seems to want that re.apportioned.

i think it's fair the way it is. if someone else built the base, but is no longer there, the fact that remaining members can't re.apportion the % contribution is part of the appeal / opportunity cost. so with the big dogs out of the outhouse, keeping the base distribution divided evenly between all members is the only way to get maximum base output. doing it the OP's way, means that a lvl 8 base could give full production to a lowbie rank at 100% contribution .. which would just incentivize more alt.cheating.

I dont think its lost, I think it somehow divvied up amongst the members who have donated to the base.
I was saying that if Bob donates 40% to the base and leaves then everyone should get whatever 40%/61 is (if you have a 61 man legion).

_________________
Image
Image


Mon Sep 28, 2020 4:43 am
Profile

Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:56 am
Posts: 53
Reply with quote
It's a minor annoyance at best, the actual divide is different from the 'leaderboard' and correct as per the division. It would be nice if the inactive and ex legion members weren't counted in the % tally and moved down the list positioned after current members, making the stats correct both when looking and claiming.


Mon Sep 28, 2020 9:27 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am
Posts: 3473
Reply with quote
Topherousenator wrote:
senatorhung wrote:
Cut wrote:
I for one dont understand what you posted. Care to elaborate?


if you look at the upgrades to the base .. everyone, including former members, are assigned a % based on their total contributions (which equate ctp and EM at the same ratio for some strange reason known only to Dan). when former members (or visitors paid to make massive energy donations) depart .. they still keep their percentage .. so if the base output is assigned based on percentage contribution, a bunch of base production is lost to those who are no longer members. the OP seems to want that re.apportioned.

i think it's fair the way it is. if someone else built the base, but is no longer there, the fact that remaining members can't re.apportion the % contribution is part of the appeal / opportunity cost. so with the big dogs out of the outhouse, keeping the base distribution divided evenly between all members is the only way to get maximum base output. doing it the OP's way, means that a lvl 8 base could give full production to a lowbie rank at 100% contribution .. which would just incentivize more alt.cheating.

I dont think its lost, I think it somehow divvied up amongst the members who have donated to the base.
I was saying that if Bob donates 40% to the base and leaves then everyone should get whatever 40%/61 is (if you have a 61 man legion).


any suggestion that benefits cheaters more than actual players of the game is an automatic thumbs down from me.

_________________
Rank 3950 Litheor Governor 100% DCR r385-r2200 GL Marauder #26
_____________Image
PvP leaderboards: 70212 raids: #1; 40852 kills: #1; 96377 hacks: #3;


Mon Sep 28, 2020 9:54 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:11 am
Posts: 899
Location: Turn Around
Reply with quote
senatorhung wrote:
Cut wrote:
I for one dont understand what you posted. Care to elaborate?


so if the base output is assigned based on percentage contribution, a bunch of base production is lost to those who are no longer members.

Are you certain about this? Because I don't think this is the case, which is the point I have been trying to make

_________________
Image
Image


Tue Sep 29, 2020 2:40 am
Profile

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:23 pm
Posts: 333
Reply with quote
I have noticed some Trainees/Graduates are listed as Current, when they havent been in the legion for quite awhile

_________________
Image


Tue Oct 06, 2020 1:05 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 8 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.