I agree with why the damage they take should be lower due to size for that analogy, the damage they are doing to Jason makes little sense. How can 8000 atk cause 500 damage to 32,000 defense?I find that ships who have 11K attak usually only deal me about 100 to 200 damage when they are a similar size, my ship is NOT small so you can;t argue that only 5% of their weapons are hitting me.

So, by the same token, and a similar analogy as Epic Ownage.

I agree that If I am in a Destroyer, and I put all my guns to bear on a man in a speed-boat, the speed boat might go largely undamaged because of size & speed.
But the speed boat doesn't have a lot of fire-power.

lets say the speed boat has are two men with rocket launchers, they will almost certainly hit me, I'm a huge target, but why would those two rocket launchers deal me more damage than if I happened upon a cruiser that had 3 men with rocket launchers?

The cruiser is larger, surely, so I can hit it more readily and deal it more damage, I again agree to that.

However the cruiser has 1/3 more firepower and I am still a large target that is easy to hit to them as surely as I was for the speedboat.

So, why is it then that my very high defense reduces the cruiser's damage further than it reduces the speed boat's damage?

The weapons are the same, the target is the same, the only real difference is that the larger attacker should be easier to hit.

-Q