I know this has brought up many times before, but this really needs to be addressed.

Dan! FIX YOUR INVASION CALCULATOR



Failure should literally have been impossible

Its to protect the planets owner, ya it sucks when we are invading but its worth it when someone is invading one of ours.. Ive had alot of bad experiences also, with some very good VM planets..

I guess to make it "fair", even if your planet has an absurd defense, like mission exotics and mission dysons, there's still a 10% chance to take them :/

I mean that if there's always a chance to keep your least defended planet, then there should also always be a chance to lose your most heavily defended

There is a chance to lose both. I'm saying that a planet with 0 defenses should be a 100% success rate.

There is a chance to lose both. I'm saying that a planet with 0 defenses should be a 100% success rate.

I mean that if there's always a chance to keep your least defended planet, then there should also always be a chance to lose your most heavily defended

I don't understand what you're getting at.

I believe the way the equation works is currently like this, assuming you have some attack.

Think of it like in DnD, even if you should by all means strike a killing blow if you roll a 1 you weapon flys out of your hand. And even if you should never be able to hit a guy if you a roll a 20 you somehow manage to actually hit him.

but that's just it... you did try that, and they said who the hell are you

against my thetacron cannons and mind influencers and general huge ship and 700 crew all well armed with tetryon pulse launchers and handheld phasers.

I guess to make it "fair", even if your planet has an absurd defense, like mission exotics and mission dysons, there's still a 10% chance to take them :/

less than that i've heard of 1 to 2 percent chance from low ranks hitting a mission exotic from an inactive player