Author |
Message |
itsSoulPLayAgain
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:30 am Posts: 4230
|
I think if you go inactive for over 1 month the planets should lose there invulnerable ability.
_________________ RNG makes mistake one time, People blame it for life. Damn sucks to be it.
|
Sat Sep 17, 2011 8:42 pm |
|
 |
Terrorize
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 9:18 am Posts: 1086
|
itsSoulPLayAgain wrote: I think if you go inactive for over 1 month the planets should lose there invulnerable ability. So if for example someone loses there net for awhile, or moves home etc, they should be punished by potenially lossing a planet worth $50?.. -1
|
Sat Sep 17, 2011 8:47 pm |
|
 |
TheSpartan
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 3:18 am Posts: 1012
|
well wouldn't they? I mean you hear about unoccupied gaia's more and more often, I can only assume that if you're inactive long enough you just lose everything, which is why we see the gaia's(who would abandon that?) my point is, I don't think there's a problem here
_________________ Galactic Alliance
|
Sat Sep 17, 2011 8:47 pm |
|
 |
Terrorize
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 9:18 am Posts: 1086
|
TheSpartan wrote: well wouldn't they? I mean you hear about unoccupied gaia's more and more often, I can only assume that if you're inactive long enough you just lose everything, which is why we see the gaia's(who would abandon that?) my point is, I don't think there's a problem here No, I've got a friend playing that hasnt been online for over 6 months, yet still holds the planets he has that are on my scan. Only banned players or players who have reset lose all there planets, thats why you find unoccupied gaia's etc.
|
Sat Sep 17, 2011 8:57 pm |
|
 |
Valocis
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 7:32 pm Posts: 582
|
Terrorize wrote: TheSpartan wrote: well wouldn't they? I mean you hear about unoccupied gaia's more and more often, I can only assume that if you're inactive long enough you just lose everything, which is why we see the gaia's(who would abandon that?) my point is, I don't think there's a problem here No, I've got a friend playing that hasnt been online for over 6 months, yet still holds the planets he has that are on my scan. Only banned players or players who have reset lose all there planets, thats why you find unoccupied gaia's etc. Wait...I think what he is suggesting is they lose the Invulnerability of the planet, not actually lose the planet......so are you objecting to THAT or are you thinking he said they should lose the planet? I would agree with you if what you thought he said, but I don't think what you thought he said is what he said he thought.........
_________________ Founder and Supreme Commander(Former) of the Legion Home One and now its enemy.
|
Sun Sep 18, 2011 6:21 am |
|
 |
Alz
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 3:17 am Posts: 170
|
how about no? People paid there money for these planets let them keep them. if we need more planets int he universe Dan can literaly add millions with a click of a button.
_________________
|
Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:32 pm |
|
 |
A.Chuisle.Mo.Chroi
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:25 am Posts: 1
|
I lost my planet the other day .. a tiny exotic ... now it's some superfreakin huge rift planet that I can't even try to take back ... that just sucks ... someone actually paid $50 to do that ?? I say let them have it lol. 
|
Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:30 am |
|
 |
devinsimps
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 2:16 am Posts: 473 Location: On the bridge of the Korqualin Queen
|
eh, well i think there should be a max, say like of a year b4 any of the players "invulnerable" planets become free game. and then all hell can break loose.
_________________[CENTER]  [/CENTER]
|
Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:09 am |
|
 |
Valocis
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 7:32 pm Posts: 582
|
devinsimps wrote: eh, well i think there should be a max, say like of a year b4 any of the players "invulnerable" planets become free game. and then all hell can break loose. I agree. IF that was how it was then I would not have had Dan remove that planet, Eoins, from my Database. ON the other hand, WHY would your rift a Very Tiny Exotic with Extremely Rich Mining and not a 15X planet is beyond me.......
_________________ Founder and Supreme Commander(Former) of the Legion Home One and now its enemy.
|
Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:48 am |
|
 |
Lone.Lycan
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:44 am Posts: 3751
|
some people are impatient... some people don't think they'll ever have the resources to bump a planet up to 15x... some people think they'll never own a 15x all planet.... some people want a VT exotic to actually be useful
i agree it's a huge waste, but at least that VT is now MC
__________________________ 
Officer Namba1 of The Unknown, Lv.666+ Dark Smuggler

|
Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:07 pm |
|
 |
ODragon
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 1:16 am Posts: 3824
|
Valocis wrote: I agree. IF that was how it was then I would not have had Dan remove that planet, Eoins, from my Database. ON the other hand, WHY would your rift a Very Tiny Exotic with Extremely Rich Mining and not a 15X planet is beyond me....... Some people also don't read or understand. They see +15 as 15x, thinking it would work like like the hyper-terraformer/dyson-maker, giving it a specific X amount, not a +15.
|
Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:12 pm |
|
 |
Uy23e
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:04 am Posts: 1998
|
Errr... can you rift a rift? It says "any planet" and not non-rift planet does that mean... you can multi rift and keep piling up the production? (+45 for the 3 you can get) If so, it makes perfect since to be invulnerable, or ppl can potentially have 3812x mega rich or such(ok, that would cost a lot, but~)
_________________ 当所有传奇写下第一个篇章 原来所谓英雄也和我们一样 私は一発の銃弾、銃弾は人の心を持たない。故に、何も考えない。ただ、目的に向かって飛ぶだけ
|
Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:48 pm |
|
 |
TheSpartan
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 3:18 am Posts: 1012
|
Uy23e wrote: Errr... can you rift a rift? It says "any planet" and not non-rift planet does that mean... you can multi rift and keep piling up the production? (+45 for the 3 you can get) If so, it makes perfect since to be invulnerable, or ppl can potentially have 3812x mega rich or such(ok, that would cost a lot, but~) what? no, you can't rift any planet that's already invincible
_________________ Galactic Alliance
|
Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:54 pm |
|
 |
Uy23e
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:04 am Posts: 1998
|
In that case, the suggestion should be changed to(or rather better worded as)
Invincible effect is negated while the owner is 1 month or more away. In other words, if someone else takes it, it becomes invincible again, so it can't be re-rifted.
I think it's a good idea, although the duration can be something to be discussed. For example, a player is only considered "dead inactive" if he is 2 or more month away. (this duration increase by 1 week for each 50 or 100 bucks spent) and this negation of invinc only triggers if a player is "dead inactive"
_________________ 当所有传奇写下第一个篇章 原来所谓英雄也和我们一样 私は一発の銃弾、銃弾は人の心を持たない。故に、何も考えない。ただ、目的に向かって飛ぶだけ
|
Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:10 pm |
|
 |
TheSpartan
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 3:18 am Posts: 1012
|
Uy23e wrote: In that case, the suggestion should be changed to(or rather better worded as)
Invincible effect is negated while the owner is 1 month or more away. In other words, if someone else takes it, it becomes invincible again, so it can't be re-rifted.
I think it's a good idea, although the duration can be something to be discussed. For example, a player is only considered "dead inactive" if he is 2 or more month away. (this duration increase by 1 week for each 50 or 100 bucks spent) and this negation of invinc only triggers if a player is "dead inactive" I think if something like this would be placed at 6 months of inactivity...not 2
_________________ Galactic Alliance
|
Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:23 pm |
|
 |
Revis
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 3:00 am Posts: 332
|
also, nobody but the original maker can have the invincibility. if you didnt pay, you dont get it
_________________
|
Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:38 am |
|
 |
Youdontkno
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:07 am Posts: 264
|
+ 1 to that idea, after you go inactive, you are either too busy to play or cant. Either way i think rift planets should lose the invincibility, once the own has been inactive for X amount of time 
_________________ Adapt and Overcome!
|
Sun Sep 25, 2011 5:51 am |
|
 |
Delta62
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:14 am Posts: 103
|
and those in the military? what if they play this at home and while out on duty can't possibly play this?
_________________ "I'm in space."
|
Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:31 am |
|
 |
Youdontkno
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:07 am Posts: 264
|
"owner being inactive for X amount of time bro, could be a year, a second, a century w/e, X is the variable of time tht id would take. AND that will be decided by dan.
_________________ Adapt and Overcome!
|
Mon Sep 26, 2011 1:12 am |
|
 |
Valocis
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 7:32 pm Posts: 582
|
Delta62 wrote: and those in the military? what if they play this at home and while out on duty can't possibly play this? That is an unfortunate "if" there is really nothing anyone of can do about that. But anyways, They would just have to log on once within 6 months......IS that impossible? I mean I know nothing of how the military works, but can't he like use his cell phone or something? Are they even allowed to have Cell Phones.
_________________ Founder and Supreme Commander(Former) of the Legion Home One and now its enemy.
|
Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:28 am |
|
 |
|