| Galaxy Legion Forum http://galaxylegion.com/forum/ |
|
| containment missles http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=19481 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | bemos [ Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | containment missles |
just a refresher: is it really right that a person with zero actions left can sit there and toss out containment missles like candy and you cant do a thing about it because they have zero actions and didnt ask for any finger pointing nobody was singled out its a suggestion that is all |
|
| Author: | mojo311 [ Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: containment missles |
lol funny hearing one of you guys say it. Not saying that you are all that way but I have seen many from your legion doing it. If we have someone over here doing it let me know. I strongly agree with this still. It can get very old. |
|
| Author: | gert [ Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: containment missles |
bemos wrote: just a refresher: is it really right that a person with zero actions left can sit there and toss out containment missles like candy and you cant do a thing about it because they have zero actions Agreed this has to change. |
|
| Author: | Darth Flagitious [ Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: containment missles |
+1 that some alteration needs to be made. -1 for whinyness |
|
| Author: | Preliator Xzien [ Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: containment missles |
Darth Flagitious wrote: +1 that some alteration needs to be made. -1 for whinyness ditto |
|
| Author: | FerrusManus [ Wed Jan 18, 2012 6:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: containment missles |
Xzien wrote: Darth Flagitious wrote: +1 that some alteration needs to be made. -1 for whinyness ditto Sweet, we can start insulting each other over ideas we all agree about, I'm sure that'll get them fast-tracked for implementation. We all know how much Dan loves that on the forum. |
|
| Author: | Deathgaze [ Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: containment missles |
FerrusManus wrote: Xzien wrote: Darth Flagitious wrote: +1 that some alteration needs to be made. -1 for whinyness ditto Sweet, we can start insulting each other over ideas we all agree about, I'm sure that'll get them fast-tracked for implementation. We all know how much Dan loves that on the forum. Honestly what crawled up your ass recently? |
|
| Author: | FerrusManus [ Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: containment missles |
Deathgaze wrote: Honestly what crawled up your ass recently? Was I not making a good point? |
|
| Author: | Deathgaze [ Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: containment missles |
FerrusManus wrote: Deathgaze wrote: Honestly what crawled up your ass recently? Was I not making a good point? Usually you do, I also agree with this post, but lately youve been extra #$&*@, like someone who found faeces in their cereal |
|
| Author: | FerrusManus [ Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: containment missles |
Deathgaze wrote: FerrusManus wrote: Deathgaze wrote: Honestly what crawled up your ass recently? Was I not making a good point? Usually you do, I also agree with this post, but lately youve been extra #$&*@, like someone who found faeces in their cereal I am purely reactionary, if anything I do seems different from usual it's because there's something different in the environment. Flagitous had to accuse Bemos of whining despite agreeing with him, and Mojo had to call out The Dominion on it instead of just posting agreement. Now, you're calling me out even when you agree with me. Everybody else has gotten worse lately, including most people in this thread, I'm simply dressing to match (except that I'm still the one making good points). |
|
| Author: | Uy23e [ Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: containment missles |
I see 3 different possible "fix" for this: 1. disallow CM(and perhaps any other offensive artifact) if a player is zeroed Pro: simple Con: what if the person actully want to do real offensive action but is unable unless CM/debuff is applied first? Now they flat out can't unless they waste energy poking someone else first or something 2. CM(and perhaps any other offensive artifact) used will increase action limit, however, after such an increase toward a specific target, further uses of the artifact and the first disable/hack within the next 30 min toward the same target does not count toward action limit. (I think you get my drift of the idea~ wanna CM etc to add actions but not multi count... don't wanna bump up limit by 50 for 1 disable lol, regardless of circumstance) Pro: Probably the most complete solution Con: Probably complicated to code 3. A new special module: Enhancement Recovery Drive: Size 20 Limit 1 Effect: If your buff are removed by a CM, if you are not disabled in the next 5 minutes, all attack, defence, hull and shield related buffs are recovered. If you are not hacked in the next 5 minutes, your scan and cloak buffs are recovered. Pro: Removes the annoyance factor of CM fairly well Con: I can see this breaking out new potential problems..... There might be other options~ If 2 is at all possible, that would be my preference but meh~ |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|