Galaxy Legion Forum
http://galaxylegion.com/forum/

New planet size tiers, and reclassify the larger sizes
http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=25987		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Asheron [ Sat Jun 16, 2012 6:38 am ]
Post subject:  New planet size tiers, and reclassify the larger sizes
After Colossal (75), let's have Very Colossal (81), Extremely Colossal (87), Ultra Colossal (93) and then Mega Colossal (99).

I don't know what sounds like a good word superseding colossal to you, but possibly "immense." Hence, Immense (105), Very Immense (111), Extremely Immense (117), Ultra Immense (123) and then Mega Immense (129).

I love (and occasionally live for) the novelty of bigness. 8-)
Author:  mysterion [ Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New planet size tiers, and reclassify the larger sizes
Thats way too OP because the more space the more production and how are you gonna get past MC size (81) unless dan increases the QSE Limit -1 to me
Author:  thunderbolta [ Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New planet size tiers, and reclassify the larger sizes
If I had a MI planet, I'd uber-cloak it, even without passives. Because I have the space. So really, really kinda overpowered... -1.
Author:  Epicownage [ Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New planet size tiers, and reclassify the larger sizes
Both overpowered, never gonna happen and how would you get them there in the first place QSE's only got to V.Massive and I doubt that's gonna change anytime soon.
Author:  Asheron [ Sat Jun 16, 2012 4:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: New planet size tiers, and reclassify the larger sizes
Why skip straight to Mega-Colossal in the first place? There is "very" after (regular), and in resource scarcity, there's then "extremely" then "ultra" then "mega" so that could go for planet sizes too.
Author:  Billik [ Sat Jun 16, 2012 5:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: New planet size tiers, and reclassify the larger sizes
Planet size is fine as is, bigger means you can have more cloak, more cloak means I have a lower chance of finding it and taking it from you.
Author:  Epicownage [ Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New planet size tiers, and reclassify the larger sizes
Asheron wrote:
Why skip straight to Mega-Colossal in the first place? There is "very" after (regular), and in resource scarcity, there's then "extremely" then "ultra" then "mega" so that could go for planet sizes too.

It skips like that because Dan wanted it to, to add a little change I guess, seeing as that's the very biggest you can get it to right now.
Author:  Darth Flagitious [ Sun Jun 17, 2012 12:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: New planet size tiers, and reclassify the larger sizes
Mega Colossal was a bit of an unforeseen accident. When Dan added the Pawlacite Thaw mission he appears to have been blissfully unaware that people were making VM Icy planets. +2 to size originally made Colossal Oceanics with extra space. Then he added the new classification of Mega Colossal. This was roughly 2 years ago and it's not likely he is going to add any new size classes.
Author:  failname [ Sun Jun 17, 2012 1:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: New planet size tiers, and reclassify the larger sizes
10k combined production on one dyson? no thanks , OP
Author:  KJReed [ Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: New planet size tiers, and reclassify the larger sizes
GL wiki wrote:
Naming Controversy: Because the planet had not specifically given a title, showing only as "Colossal", players have been given to referring to them as "Extremely Colossal", "Very Colossal", "Mega Colossal", "Titanic" and "Gigantic". Given the naming conventions for other planets the proper name should be "Very Colossal". However Dan decided to break with tradition on this planet when he made it an officially accepted size in the game, instead calling it "Mega Colossal" <-- ** Verified **
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/