Galaxy Legion Forum http://galaxylegion.com/forum/ |
|
New Starbase Artifact: Combat Co-ordiation Algorithm http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=27646 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Razorback [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | New Starbase Artifact: Combat Co-ordiation Algorithm |
Size: 4 standard slots Effect: Ability to share a base that has been shared to you Limitations: Requires a Base Comm Interlink installed for each use. Requirements: Level 5 base, all three command beacons installed. Additionally, alerting ship must have all 3 Tetra-Seek Targeters installed. Scenario: Steel Talons picks up a level 5 base target. They find they can't take it down, and share it with Stormfront. Stormfront decides that in turn they will share the alert with Champions of Time. CoT, however, cannot continue the alert-chain because they do not have a direct battle pact with Steel Talons. |
Author: | SovietOfficer [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Starbase Artifact: Combat Co-ordiation Algorithm |
Pretty good idea, +1, wouldn't necessarily make bases easier just have a little extra help. |
Author: | Preliator Xzien [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Starbase Artifact: Combat Co-ordiation Algorithm |
And so base battles could end up with dozens of legions involved? No |
Author: | PatronSaint [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Starbase Artifact: Combat Co-ordiation Algorithm |
-1 |
Author: | troyamot1 [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Starbase Artifact: Combat Co-ordiation Algorithm |
# -1 I can see that making making the legion that locks it mad at times.... **And means your base would have even more legions attacking it... |
Author: | Razorback [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Starbase Artifact: Combat Co-ordiation Algorithm |
How many command beacons and BCI's do Delta have installed? Either bases have to make a space sacrifice to do it, or collectively add in the space they need. I'd be suprised if even half of the 5's out there would meet the minimums for it. It would be a way to encourage more legion participation. |
Author: | Preliator Xzien [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Starbase Artifact: Combat Co-ordiation Algorithm |
Razorback wrote: How many command beacons and BCI's do Delta have installed? Either bases have to make a space sacrifice to do it, or collectively add in the space they need. I'd be suprised if even half of the 5's out there would meet the minimums for it. It would be a way to encourage more legion participation. And how many leaderboard legions have all theirs installed, hmm? |
Author: | varunjitsingh146 [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Starbase Artifact: Combat Co-ordiation Algorithm |
-1 for all the reasons mentioned earlier. |
Author: | kirkeastment [ Sat Aug 04, 2012 7:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Starbase Artifact: Combat Co-ordiation Algorithm |
-1 If a legion and its current battle pacts cannot handle certain bases, then they should make a list and mark them off as "Do Not Lock", and tell their battle pact partners to do the same, there are hundreds of bases out there. OR The legion could just find itself some stronger battle pact partners, might be difficult to do, might not. OR If a certain group of legions are having trouble taking out bases, they could add more battle pacts. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Also, and this is directed at anyone that does this; Don't let bases live longer just to get more people on them, especially if you already have a cyclic base routine. People should know the approximate time of the next base, so should know when to be on to get in on base combat. Don't make your jobs more difficult by choice. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |