Galaxy Legion Forum
http://galaxylegion.com/forum/

shield amps still costing energy
http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=42267
Page 1 of 1

Author:  pokerman123 [ Sun Nov 30, 2014 11:17 pm ]
Post subject:  shield amps still costing energy

hello dan the seasonal is over but when i went to go use a shield amp it is still costing energy just wanted to give you a heads up notice on this part

Author:  Fenix [ Sun Nov 30, 2014 11:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: shield amps still costing energy

I can confirm this.

Author:  ICBLF [ Mon Dec 01, 2014 3:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: shield amps still costing energy

If only shield restorers and repair nanos cost 55 energy too, would be awesome.

Author:  playret0195x [ Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: shield amps still costing energy

ICBLF wrote:
If only shield restorers and repair nanos cost 55 energy too, would be awesome.

that would make PvP a bit more challenging, and defending from attacks even more challenging.

Author:  Shadeslayer [ Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: shield amps still costing energy

If only raiding other ships costs 55 energy......just sayin..;P

This appears to have been corrected though.

Author:  ICBLF [ Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: shield amps still costing energy

Shadeslayer wrote:
If only raiding other ships costs 55 energy......just sayin..;P

I'm game, though that would make yellows a lot steeper for the newer ships...

Author:  Malevolentia [ Tue Dec 02, 2014 11:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: shield amps still costing energy

Maybe raiding should cost 1 energy per 100 decks the enemy ship has, with a minimum of 5 energy? Raiding Toastar would cost in the region of 100 energy.

Author:  stevo2012 [ Tue Dec 02, 2014 12:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: shield amps still costing energy

Malevolentia wrote:
Maybe raiding should cost 1 energy per 100 decks the enemy ship has, with a minimum of 5 energy? Raiding Toastar would cost in the region of 100 energy.


i actually quite like this idea....although i probably havent thought through some of the implications of it.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/