| Galaxy Legion Forum http://galaxylegion.com/forum/ |
|
| Diplomacy http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=6122 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | christiangibson [ Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Diplomacy |
United agreement This could be for legions having trouble finding members they can request a unity with another legion and the members unite so say you only have 9 members you send it to another legion that has 11 if they accept you now have 20 members 
|
|
| Author: | Vekno [ Tue Apr 19, 2011 2:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Diplomacy |
i definitly like this idea. in addition to merging the legions, i think a name change should also be allowed for the legion. but +1 from me. |
|
| Author: | christiangibson [ Tue Apr 19, 2011 9:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Diplomacy |
that can be optional but if you dont except it then from your point of view everything will seem normal except the fact that you have more members like it will still have your legions name and stuff the ranks wont change people are still what they were, same as the point of view of the other legion that united with you, my point is if you dont agree on changing the name everything will be same from your point of view same with the other legion(s) and maybe to organize legion from legion on the top it will say (all legion members) (My Legion members) >before unity(____legion members) like on the planet screen but thats only if you dont agree on new name |
|
| Author: | Quaritch [ Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Diplomacy |
Then what would the point of view be like to everybody else? |
|
| Author: | ConnorVanecek [ Wed Apr 20, 2011 4:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Diplomacy |
I love this idea, it would make it so much easier than having to have another legion disband and hope all of them come join you. |
|
| Author: | Darth Flagitious [ Wed Apr 20, 2011 4:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Diplomacy |
meh... don't really care for this idea. with a merger under the current setup, if a 20 member legion takes a "majority rules" vote, 11 people say merge you are at least giving the other 9 the option to keep the old legion and work with it. With this idea, you would be forcing those 9 people to either "do as I say" or find another legion. perhaps those people want to stay together as a group? they would either have to find a legion to take all of them or spend the energy to start another legion on their own. I can see this creating more problems than it solves. |
|
| Author: | Gwilson [ Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Diplomacy |
1+ i think it be good to fully merge legions at times, not just put two under same name and have NAP's. this would defiantly help smaller slow moving legions. 
|
|
| Author: | christiangibson [ Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Diplomacy |
the whole point of this idea is to get more members for your legion i doubt any one would reject to that you can either agree to a new name or you can just have tow legion working with each other maybe more how is that a bad thing |
|
| Author: | zophah [ Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Diplomacy |
I say we should wait for the Legion update that is coming within 8 days before throwing in more ideas. The update is going to be BIG and no doubt something like this will be in there. Once it comes, you will have a lot more to talk about. |
|
| Author: | christiangibson [ Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Diplomacy |
I was thinking when this dos happen and tow legions unite what if Scenario Tow legions unite and all seems well the member total is 42 but one of the legions has a twisted mind set one of the leaders demote every one of the other legion completely taking control of the other legion every one is forced to fallow or leave Solution when under unity leaders or officers of a legion cannot demote or promote members of the other united legion |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|