View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 8:42 am



Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
 New Mission : The Nova Project 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:51 am
Posts: 2371
Reply with quote
The Nova project

Description : Many gas planets have all the materials within there atmosphere similar to a small star, Using enriched pawlacite, we can ignite the gases with the Gas planets atmosphere, starting a nuclear fusion reaction and transforming it into a nova planet, the size increase of the planet will be enormous!

Award : Pawlacite Bomb (transform Gas planets into a Nova Planet)(Size increase by 3, Resource by 1)(Grants 200 passive defence)
Requirements : 100 pawlacite, + 500 energy
30 rounds _ 3 completions
Risks : Potential of Prior bomb explosion (Ship disabled [regardless of hull],mission failure [3% chance]) potential of pawlacite heat leak ( Crew member killed [8% chance[)

Notes : If used on a very massive planet, it will turn into a "Titanic" the size after the Megacolosal

_________________
Image


Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:42 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:48 am
Posts: 3900
Reply with quote
i wouldnt mind transforming my megarich vmassive into a titanic. EPIC!!!

_________________
Image
Image


Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:52 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:45 am
Posts: 778
Reply with quote
I really like the sound of this. Gas planets are soo common and they rarely have decent stats, other than their size. Allowing them to be the only planet that can reach titanic size would just be sweet and give the planet type a new way to be distinct from the others.

+1 from me.

_________________
"Anyone without a sense of humour is truly at the mercy of the rest of us."

My folding@home stats :)
Image


Fri Apr 22, 2011 8:00 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 6:22 pm
Posts: 1760
Location: On the bridge of the Vikiera
Reply with quote
I think the 'upgraded' planet name should be nebula.

_________________
Image
I have suggested 7 Races, 5 Organizations, 3 locations, 3 materials, and 20 planets.
View my profile interests for a full list.


Fri Apr 22, 2011 12:46 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:11 pm
Posts: 883
Location: invading your planet
Reply with quote
I like it


Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:29 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:51 am
Posts: 2371
Reply with quote
zophah wrote:
I think the 'upgraded' planet name should be nebula.

why would it be called nebula, a nebula isnt a planet, so are you suppose to build stuff on it ?

_________________
Image


Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:55 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 9:45 pm
Posts: 510
Reply with quote
+1

but with most of my GAS planets I would really like to see the resources also increase by 3.

I would suggest that the mission be available at various ranks
#1of3 after reaching rank 100
2of3 after reaching rank 200
3of3 after reaching rank 400.

and if the planet is taken then the mission resets and allows you to redo the mission.

just my two cents.

_________________
Image


Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:11 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 6:33 am
Posts: 2519
Location: Behind you
Reply with quote
+1 but too many risks, like the crew member death.
And i think you should make the resource increase bigger, even if you would have to make the sie increase smaller.

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage

Champions of Time: Kronyn Builder : Rank 463


Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:23 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 6:22 pm
Posts: 1760
Location: On the bridge of the Vikiera
Reply with quote
Commonwealth <TK> wrote:
zophah wrote:
I think the 'upgraded' planet name should be nebula.
why would it be called nebula, a nebula isnt a planet, so are you suppose to build stuff on it ?

Technically you can't build anything "on" a gas planet either.
My reasoning for naming it a nebula is for the greatly increased size, as nebulae are really grandiose.

_________________
Image
I have suggested 7 Races, 5 Organizations, 3 locations, 3 materials, and 20 planets.
View my profile interests for a full list.


Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:05 pm
Profile

Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:25 pm
Posts: 84
Reply with quote
I say we stick with Nova as the name. But because it is a star, the population would have to be 0, because everything on a star turns to plasma. This could open up a new branch of research. finding ways to survive on a star and being able to place buildings on a star.


Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:36 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 6:22 pm
Posts: 1760
Location: On the bridge of the Vikiera
Reply with quote
ConnorVanecek wrote:
I say we stick with Nova as the name. But because it is a star, the population would have to be 0, because everything on a star turns to plasma. This could open up a new branch of research. finding ways to survive on a star and being able to place buildings on a star.

Wouldn't that leave it as invade-able at every moment? I'd be too worried that I would lose it.

_________________
Image
I have suggested 7 Races, 5 Organizations, 3 locations, 3 materials, and 20 planets.
View my profile interests for a full list.


Fri Apr 22, 2011 5:47 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 6:33 am
Posts: 2519
Location: Behind you
Reply with quote
zophah wrote:
ConnorVanecek wrote:
I say we stick with Nova as the name. But because it is a star, the population would have to be 0, because everything on a star turns to plasma. This could open up a new branch of research. finding ways to survive on a star and being able to place buildings on a star.

Wouldn't that leave it as invade-able at every moment? I'd be too worried that I would lose it.

i agree with zopha

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage

Champions of Time: Kronyn Builder : Rank 463


Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:05 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 9:16 pm
Posts: 1209
Reply with quote
I have to question the physics of this. I know that no one is really an astronomer or a physicist so the science of the game is iffy, and that's cool. It's a fun game. But how could you rationalize turning a planet into a star?

_________________
Image


Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:04 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:51 am
Posts: 2371
Reply with quote
Quaritch wrote:
I have to question the physics of this. I know that no one is really an astronomer or a physicist so the science of the game is iffy, and that's cool. It's a fun game. But how could you rationalize turning a planet into a star?


The Planet Jupiter has alot of hydrogen in its thick atmosphere, most stars fuse hydrogen together to form helium and fuse helium together to form berrylium so on and so forth, fusing atoms is known as nuclear fusion and release enormous amounts of energy, Its how hydrogen atomic bombs work. The Sun's enormous gravity can fuse hydrogen atoms together within the suns core, thus releasing releasing lots of heat energy, like a nuke, but really really big one! Using a pawlacite bomb, we can ignite the hydrogen and BOOM! There's star. If jupiter was larger, it could potentially be a second sun in our sky, but that really mess up our 12 hours day and night. lolol

_________________
Image


Sat Apr 23, 2011 1:27 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 14 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.