View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 9:35 pm



Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 Rank Points per Level 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am
Posts: 3473
Reply with quote
17may2012 - rank 84 - rank points per level: 9.18
16dec2012 - rank 187 - rank points per level: 17.60

_________________
Rank 3950 Litheor Governor 100% DCR r385-r2200 GL Marauder #26
_____________Image
PvP leaderboards: 70212 raids: #1; 40852 kills: #1; 96377 hacks: #3;


Sun Dec 16, 2012 4:07 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:53 pm
Posts: 3756
Location: Aboard my floating fortress of ineptitude
Reply with quote
Bluecifer wrote:
21.1 - Rank 307

Rank 24 - 13 :lol:

_________________
Image
Inventor of Invisible SandTM


Sun Dec 16, 2012 5:40 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:38 am
Posts: 104
Reply with quote
Crikey... just used the formula, and I have 6.8111111 rank points per level.
I'm surprised I'm not disabled/hacked/raided more often than I am to be honest o.O
My K/D ratio is 116:49

Part of my problem was that I was in a tiny legion for too long, and the base was still only level 2 when I left.
Maybe I should stop ranking up so quickly, just keep getting random artifacts in the hope of getting more shipbots, rescued prisoners, etc.

I'm at Rank 80. Is it a good idea to stop gaining XP, and focus on building a stronger ship with artifacts?
My outputs are (per hour):
Research: 1,049
Artifact: 752
Mining: 263


Sun Dec 16, 2012 7:20 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:27 pm
Posts: 1220
Reply with quote
using my own formular, (decks + (cargo/5) + ((Engineers + Tactical Officers + Helmsmen)/2) + (Scientists/3))/rank

I droped down from 22.50 to 21,37 due to masiv NPC hunting over the last 2 weeks
but should go up again once I stop hunting Silthion Hybrid Drone + scruuge NPC's

_________________
Champion of Darmos
Image


Mon Dec 17, 2012 4:03 pm
Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:56 pm
Posts: 1403
Reply with quote
50 counting cargo. 37 not counting cargo.

_________________
Image
Check out my music!
http://www.soundcloud.com/silverstitchedcrow


Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:02 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:26 am
Posts: 337
Reply with quote
53 with cargo... i think i calculated correctly?

_________________
MiracleOne, The Annihilator: Rank 1050
Insane (Epic Legendary) Unbuffed Strength: 120,000+ w/Unbuffed Armor: 250,000+

Image
The Dark Justice, assisting New Ship Members w/Everyday Even Strong Artifacts Payout


Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:11 am
Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:28 pm
Posts: 264
Reply with quote
17.1 at rank 91, this if i worked it out correctly lol

_________________
Image


Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:19 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:33 pm
Posts: 654
Location: Malaysia
Reply with quote
47.5 at 224? I think? I shuck at maths.

_________________
ImageImage
ImageImage


Sun Dec 23, 2012 5:19 am
Profile

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:00 am
Posts: 1154
Reply with quote
25.12 at rank 678 with Anna formula and 40 with the other formula


Sun Dec 23, 2012 2:58 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:25 am
Posts: 2360
Location: New York
Reply with quote
been a while since this surfaced, wanted to check in an see how people were doing
rank 478 >> 72.5

_________________
ImageImage


Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:58 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:22 pm
Posts: 140
Reply with quote
41.7
Thought it'd be higher...

_________________
Rank 750+ Taltherian Excavator
#20ish on stat farmers leaderboard
#10ish raids board
#20ish hacks board. Hacking sucks.


Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:27 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:13 pm
Posts: 2711
Location: Somewhere trying to find a way to increase the use of Time Manipulators.
Reply with quote
46.02 Using Darkmar's formula
(3494 + (50000/5) + ((2750 + 9020 + 3064)/2) + (5474/3))/494[/color]
DarkMar wrote:
(decks + (cargo/5) + ((Engineers + Tactical Officers + Helmsmen)/2) + (Scientists/3))/rank

40.23 Using Annabell's formula
(((3494-20) + ((50000-50) / 5) + (((2750+9020+3064)-90) / 2) + ((5474-10) / 3)) / 494)
Annabell wrote:
(((Decks-20) + ((Cargo-50) / 5) + (((Engineers+Tactical Officers+Helmsmen)-90) / 2) + ((Scientists-10) / 3)) / Rank) = equivalent Rank Points per Rank

_________________
Why the $%&% are you looking at my signature for...?


Tue Jun 04, 2013 8:19 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 7:33 pm
Posts: 1988
Location: Aboard Blackwood Hall
Reply with quote
DarkMar's formula doesn't account for the basic starting statistics, thus giving credit for an additional 74.44 Rank Points that don't exist. :ugeek:

Anyway, I'm no Elarian, but I've managed to triple my numbers from the last time I calculated this. ^_^

_________________
DixieLandDelight: Lord SoulPlay's Padawan & Warden of the Chesterton Royal Asylum

Image
Image


Tue Jun 04, 2013 8:26 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:08 am
Posts: 3142
Reply with quote
TimeManipulator wrote:
46.02 Using Darkmar's formula
(3494 + (50000/5) + ((2750 + 9020 + 3064)/2) + (5474/3))/494[/color]
DarkMar wrote:
(decks + (cargo/5) + ((Engineers + Tactical Officers + Helmsmen)/2) + (Scientists/3))/rank

40.23 Using Annabell's formula
(((3494-20) + ((50000-50) / 5) + (((2750+9020+3064)-90) / 2) + ((5474-10) / 3)) / 494)
Annabell wrote:
(((Decks-20) + ((Cargo-50) / 5) + (((Engineers+Tactical Officers+Helmsmen)-90) / 2) + ((Scientists-10) / 3)) / Rank) = equivalent Rank Points per Rank

second formula should give you around 45.8. your math is off somewhere.

_________________
Image
http://www.universegenesis.com/bonus.php?id=7704&rofl=1f1616039121f25&lol=72141855&boss=SteelWolverine


ICBLF wrote:
to be honest, I was rooting for you even while eating KVTs


Tue Jun 04, 2013 8:30 pm
Profile

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 10:43 pm
Posts: 769
Reply with quote
Everyone! I have a point to bring up. A lot of these things aren't rank points, particularly... You can get 300 scientists from the Kronyn Exodus, 230 scientists from Decrypting the Vault, 20 engineers, scientists, TOs, and helmsmen from Suspicious Construction, and 50 engineers, 125 scientists from Prototype Engineering. That's a total of 675 scientists, 70 engineers, 20 TOs, and 20 helmsmen. The formula does not account for those.

_________________
Don't mess. With my pie.


Tue Jun 04, 2013 8:38 pm
Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:49 pm
Posts: 687
Reply with quote
REMOVED

_________________
https://www.facebook.com/cen.dant.9


Last edited by Cendant on Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:31 am, edited 1 time in total.



Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:16 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:13 pm
Posts: 2711
Location: Somewhere trying to find a way to increase the use of Time Manipulators.
Reply with quote
KJReed wrote:
second formula should give you around 45.8. your math is off somewhere.

Tbh, I have no idea where I went wrong... are you talking about Anna's or Dark's?

_________________
Why the $%&% are you looking at my signature for...?


Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:21 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:01 am
Posts: 56
Reply with quote
18.6495934959 at rank 205. Not bad, but I think it could be higher.

I used the followin formula:

(((Decks-20) + ((Cargo-50) / 5) + (((Engineers+Tactical Officers+Helmsmen)-90) / 2) + ((Scientists-10) / 3)) / Rank) = equivalent Rank Points per Rank

_________________
Image


Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:49 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:08 am
Posts: 3142
Reply with quote
TimeManipulator wrote:
KJReed wrote:
second formula should give you around 45.8. your math is off somewhere.

Tbh, I have no idea where I went wrong... are you talking about Anna's or Dark's?

annas should give 45.8.
darks you did right

_________________
Image
http://www.universegenesis.com/bonus.php?id=7704&rofl=1f1616039121f25&lol=72141855&boss=SteelWolverine


ICBLF wrote:
to be honest, I was rooting for you even while eating KVTs


Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:07 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:13 pm
Posts: 2711
Location: Somewhere trying to find a way to increase the use of Time Manipulators.
Reply with quote
KJReed wrote:
TimeManipulator wrote:
KJReed wrote:
second formula should give you around 45.8. your math is off somewhere.

Tbh, I have no idea where I went wrong... are you talking about Anna's or Dark's?

annas should give 45.8.
darks you did right

Ahh I see where I went wrong. Had added 3474 + 49950 then divided it by 5, the rest I did right.

_________________
Why the $%&% are you looking at my signature for...?


Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:18 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.