Ship Strength to Rank Ratio
Author |
Message |
eternalpaw
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:31 pm Posts: 471
|
38.125 rank 160
_________________ 
|
Tue Aug 27, 2013 3:34 am |
|
 |
MiracleOne
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:26 am Posts: 337
|
Nice! With your production, I wouldn't worry too much about slow ranking.... I think I was around 72.00 @rank 500, now I m rank 640 (83.00)
plus doing some auto ranking and my Anubix, AI Assault Drone completed at Rank: 100 
_________________MiracleOne, The Annihilator: Rank 1050Insane (Epic Legendary) Unbuffed Strength: 120,000+ w/Unbuffed Armor: 250,000+ The Dark Justice, assisting New Ship Members w/Everyday Even Strong Artifacts Payout
|
Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:21 am |
|
 |
elerian
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:25 am Posts: 2360 Location: New York
|
actually slow ranking with purpose though, have a couple of rank 500 goals I am trying to accomplish, and beyond that game wide goals as well, but I'll update all of that information on my ship log when the big 5 oh oh comes.
_________________ 
|
Tue Aug 27, 2013 5:05 am |
|
 |
Crazyh
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 9:08 am Posts: 55
|
I'm at 73.17 ss/r  Rank 437 (I'm kronyn race) Only 12.25 ss/d though  2609 decks.
|
Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:47 am |
|
 |
not4use
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:15 pm Posts: 303
|

I have a suggestion for a change to the way the second formula is calculated, which at the moment seems to be resulting in ship strength ratios with too much variation. Obviously the second formula is trying to factor in the difficulty of disabling a low deck build or SSB, which is the most significant strength of some ships but also a factor for all ships no matter what rank. I think a few people have mentioned some of the draw backs there are in building a ship based solely on a low damage cap and by dividing the total of your ATT+DEF+HULL+SHIELDS by the damage cap and then again by rank the second formula places far too much weight into the benefits of a SSB. Basically it is too large a number to divide a ship's stats by for anyone that dared to have more than a few hundred decks on their ship. So anyway, after what has turned out to be a bit of a long winded explanation I think I have a really simple solution; instead of dividing by your damage cap and then again by your rank, ADD them together before dividing and don't worry about having to multiply by 100 at the end. So it would be:
(ATT+DEF+HULL+SHIELDS) / (CAP+RANK) = SS:R <- - - - - Add CAP+RANK together before dividing & DO NOT multiply by 100.
I haven't worked out my own yet cause I didn't want to just find something which worked well with my particular stats but not for other types of builds or different ranks. However, I did test it out for a few of the ships that are known to be some of the strongest in the game and a few that are at the top for their rank, as well as a couple of genuine SSBs, a decent MSB, a slow ranker, and one high rank low deck build and this change does seem to stop the huge variation between ranks and the massive variation there was between some ships' SS:R using the first formula and what is was using the second formula. But if this change is giving you some unusual results please post them up so someone can figure out why it isn't working as a reasonable per rank comparison of ship strength.
_________________
|
Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:24 pm |
|
 |
The Prisoner
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:28 pm Posts: 468
|
From Dicky's equation, I get:
29.1973039216, Rank 316, Cap of 500
_________________ IGN: Itachi Uchiha
|
Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:53 pm |
|
 |
senatorhung
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am Posts: 3473
|

not4use wrote: instead of dividing by your damage cap and then again by your rank, ADD them together before dividing and don't worry about having to multiply by 100 at the end. So it would be:
(ATT+DEF+HULL+SHIELDS) / (CAP+RANK) = SS:R <- - - - - Add CAP+RANK together before dividing & DO NOT multiply by 100.
i can give cautious approval to the proposed defense strength formula. the charts on the left use the current formula, dividing by cap and then by rank; the charts on the right use the proposed new defense strength formula. the charts on the top use a logarithmic scale for the defense strength, while those on the bottom use a linear scale. data is from the pilots used in the ship log showdown.  analysis: 1. SSB strength at low ranks is severely diminished 2. SSB/MSB strength at mid/high ranks is greatly increased 3. overall upward trend with rank on both log and linear charts 4. ship build size is less distinguishable 5. ic*'s shipbuild moves higher in defensive strength than elerian's larger deck build
_________________Rank 3950 Litheor Governor 100% DCR r385-r2200 GL Marauder #26 _____________ PvP leaderboards: 70212 raids: #1; 40852 kills: #1; 96377 hacks: #3;
|
Wed Aug 28, 2013 9:09 pm |
|
 |
Deigobene
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:26 pm Posts: 1076
|
not4use wrote: (ATT+DEF+HULL+SHIELDS) / (CAP+RANK) = SS:R <- - - - - Add CAP+RANK together before dividing & DO NOT multiply by 100. Great idea, I think not4use's revised calculation is a definite improvement, and senatorhung's graphs seem to reflect that it is more useful using the revised calculation. The improvement is perfectly illustrated for me by the greater spread across all ranks and ship builds and the dramatic change to Golgotha's positioning - the fact he was scoring so low on the old calculation in comparison to low rank SSBs always seemed a bit strange to me.
|
Wed Aug 28, 2013 11:32 pm |
|
 |
Wolfy Minion
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:16 am Posts: 2737
|
You guys and your formulas. Just use the ones Dan uses and it will be a lot simpler.
cap = deck/2 or (rank+19)/2 Min shot = (hull+shield)/cap Damage per shot = cap*tanh(attack*[0.6 to 1/0.6]/(5*defense))
average shot at a given attack= (hull+shield)/cap*tanh(attack*[0.6 to 1/0.6]/(5*defense)) Pick a suitable attack, maybe what is considered "average" for their rank and then solve. More shots required the stronger the ship.
_________________ 
|
Thu Aug 29, 2013 1:17 am |
|
 |
not4use
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:15 pm Posts: 303
|
_________________
|
Thu Aug 29, 2013 1:48 am |
|
 |
senatorhung
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am Posts: 3473
|
another option would be to get away from combining attack and defense into a single ship strength stat. instead: POWER = attack / rank TOUGHNESS = (defense + hull + shield) / (damage cap + rank) here are charts, with power/toughness on the left, and not4use's suggestion on the right:  EDIT1: thus, instead of talking about how 'strong' a ship is, a more powerful ship would be one which has high attack power, while a tough ship is one that will require a lot of effort and energy to disable. EDIT2: it would be neat if folks who get the exotica medal in the future could post their power used to acquire Exotica, and their toughness used to keep it for 8 hours ... call it the Golgotha comparison test 
_________________Rank 3950 Litheor Governor 100% DCR r385-r2200 GL Marauder #26 _____________ PvP leaderboards: 70212 raids: #1; 40852 kills: #1; 96377 hacks: #3;
Last edited by senatorhung on Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:09 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:46 am |
|
 |
not4use
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:15 pm Posts: 303
|
I like that split. It seems to be very much in line with how your ship's stats are divided in the game. The best part is that wolfy will love that this means MOAARRR formulas. He's always going on about how we need more formulas...oh, wait...maybe that was someone...MOAR, Wolfy MOARRRR!!!  Dicky Minion ~ 1350 1st . - 59.85 2nd - 46.91 ( no race or profession bonus ) ( unbuffed but including race & profession bonus, 2nd formula equals 66.22 ) ~ pity it's not a very accurate reflection if I include these
_________________
|
Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:55 am |
|
 |
MiracleOne
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:26 am Posts: 337
|
elerian wrote: actually slow ranking with purpose though, have a couple of rank 500 goals I am trying to accomplish, and beyond that game wide goals as well, but I'll update all of that information on my ship log when the big 5 oh oh comes. Heehee... i didn't want ya to beat my stats too much at 500 500 comparing lol!! 
_________________MiracleOne, The Annihilator: Rank 1050Insane (Epic Legendary) Unbuffed Strength: 120,000+ w/Unbuffed Armor: 250,000+ The Dark Justice, assisting New Ship Members w/Everyday Even Strong Artifacts Payout
|
Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:38 am |
|
 |
chiaroscuro
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 3:45 am Posts: 394 Location: hiding in CRA's curtains
|
Agree with not4use, I like the power vs toughness formulas slightly more since they separate attack and defense
At rank 350...
power = 28.5 (Konqul race bonus) toughness = 63.6 (Konqul/fixer race/profession bonus)
_________________   Banner by the one and only MyLilPony
|
Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:39 pm |
|
 |
elerian
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:25 am Posts: 2360 Location: New York
|
senatorhung wrote: POWER = attack / rank
TOUGHNESS = (defense + hull + shield) / (damage cap + rank) power = 49.9555 toughness = 35.667
_________________ 
|
Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:50 pm |
|
 |
not4use
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:15 pm Posts: 303
|
senatorhung wrote: POWER = attack / rank
TOUGHNESS = (defense + hull + shield) / (damage cap + rank) Dicky Minion - 1350 Power - 31.28 Toughness - 38.05 (no race or profession bonuses included)
_________________
|
Thu Aug 29, 2013 4:14 pm |
|
 |
The Prisoner
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:28 pm Posts: 468
|
Power: 24.55
Toughness: 19.71
Rank 318
_________________ IGN: Itachi Uchiha
|
Thu Aug 29, 2013 6:45 pm |
|
 |
Cendant
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:49 pm Posts: 687
|
REMOVED
Last edited by Cendant on Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:22 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
Thu Aug 29, 2013 8:49 pm |
|
 |
Peticks
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:44 pm Posts: 1997 Location: Causing chaos somewhere
|
Rank 236 Toughness 41.37 Power 16.95
No race or proffesion bonuses
_________________ Meow chika meow meow!!Stark Tech Inside
|
Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:04 pm |
|
 |
Topherousenator
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:11 am Posts: 899 Location: Turn Around
|
senatorhung wrote: POWER = attack / rank
TOUGHNESS = (defense + hull + shield) / (damage cap + rank) Power: 11054 / 440 = 25.1 Toughness: (13823 + 20125 + 7222) / (1600 + 440) = 20.2 Konqul Excavator*, not Fixer.
_________________ 
Last edited by Topherousenator on Fri Aug 30, 2013 4:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:24 pm |
|
 |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|