| Author |
Message |
|
Kaos
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 11:39 am
Posts: 1217
|
I never used mine. Barren planets are worthless and even with a +1 add they are mediocre at best, certainly not worth a planet slot. Has anyone else skipped using them?
_________________
Galactic Paladins - Recruiting Select Rank 300+
- #3 with level 6 base and #3 in Legion strength (not just NPC fighters)
- 13 Lab creations (all the best)
- Our base gives 22000 RP a day
|
| Sun Apr 03, 2011 4:42 pm |
 
|
|
|
mento
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:01 pm
Posts: 761
|
I didn't even bother doing the mission to get them.
_________________
|
| Sun Apr 03, 2011 4:49 pm |
|
|
|
BrianGameAcct
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 9:45 pm
Posts: 510
|
I had only one barren planet that it was worth using on. I have the rest of them waiting for the barren planet I find that is worthwhile.
_________________
|
| Sun Apr 03, 2011 4:56 pm |
|
|
|
FerrusManus
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:32 am
Posts: 4524
|
I didn't even do the mission; the reward wasn't worth it and I could still do the following missions. Someday I might, 'cause someday I might be able to get Colossals from them, but that wouldn't be for quite a while. Considering the best Barren planets are Very Large and Rich (I think), that's not that useful.
|
| Sun Apr 03, 2011 5:17 pm |
|
|
|
Iolo1
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:04 am
Posts: 113
|
I only completed the mission once to see the artifact and never used it.
As Kaos says, most barrens are junk even with the shifter and you should save your top five for sentiox.
I'm actually pretty annoyed with the whole thing because the top two barrens on my scans got turned to oceans before I could snap them up. Now I'm holding the next best just so someone doesn't turn them.
I was so happy to find out the Octafari were really a bunch of jerks because I already hated them.
|
| Sun Apr 03, 2011 6:40 pm |
|
|
|
BinaryMan
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Posts: 1671
|
Yes, very large/rich mining is the best barren I have seen. I have the sentiox too which gives +2 resources, but for a mining planet .. can't compete with a toxic. I didn't do the mission either. I will prolly end up converting them just to use it but the best hydro barren, Massive/Very Rich, basically equals the best natural Volcanic I saw, Very Large/Extremely Rich.
_________________Ex cinere surget iterum ego galaxiae dominatur. 
|
| Sun Apr 03, 2011 8:46 pm |
|
|
|
KarlLitos
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 4:26 pm
Posts: 343
|
Still have 10 hydroshifter too.
|
| Sun Apr 03, 2011 9:51 pm |
|
|
|
ODragon
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 1:16 am
Posts: 3824
|
I used 1 and have 2 more left in my hold. That's where I stopped doing the mission. I thought it was odd that we got an artifact with a bonus on oceanic planet AND then a mission that gives oceanic planets. Seems like the other way around would have made more sense.
|
| Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:21 am |
|
|
|
Commonwealth <TK>
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:51 am
Posts: 2371
|
the first planet i colonised was OK, it was barren Very Large, Very Abundant, the hydroshifting made it better
_________________
|
| Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:03 am |
|
|
|
Ffilteg
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:54 am
Posts: 211
|
I still have all 10 Hydroshifters, that said I haven't used any of the planet improving artis you get from missions. I always think i'll find something better to use them on.
|
| Mon Apr 04, 2011 1:48 pm |
|
|
|
coruscant
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:40 am
Posts: 18
|
i made my plant a massive rich
_________________
High Chairman and Founder of the Merck Family Enterprise.
|
| Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:43 am |
|
|
|
Joshball98
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 6:33 am
Posts: 2519
Location: Behind you
|
I joined GL around the time of that mission, I would find it useful to make mine a Massive/Very Rich, my cap for planets is Large+/Rich+ so it works for me
|
| Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:08 pm |
|
|
|
