Galaxy Legion Forum http://galaxylegion.com/forum/ |
|
"Unofficial" NAPs http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=6796 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Kaos [ Mon May 09, 2011 2:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | "Unofficial" NAPs |
There seems to be some confusion that at some point we (Galactic Paladins and Galactic Crusaders) had agreed to "unofficial" NAPs with various legions. Just to make sure there are no future misunderstandings, The Galactic Paladins have only once agreed to an "unofficial" NAP. That was with Project Anarchy, it was a disaster and we have never agreed to one since. Either we have a real, official NAP or we do not have any NAP at all. To be clear, the Paladins and Crusaders have different needs and NAPs are based on those needs. A nap with one of our legions does not automatically mean a NAP with the other. It never has. We play the game honestly and fairly. We do not farm random legions, their players or their planets. One attack is NOT farming. The only time we multiple attack is during wars which are started by the other legion and not us. If you feel the need to start a war with us over badge hits or planet invasions we understand that. I would do the same thing over a planet and do not deny anyone the right to defend themselves. Do not believe we have a NAP because someone said that someone else said that a guy in another legion said it was unofficial but we have one. If it is not on your diplomacy tab, it is not real. |
Author: | Chakotay [ Mon May 09, 2011 3:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: "Unofficial" NAPs |
Last I knew you guys use it for a buffer to clear each others alerts.... when ending a hasty engagement. |
Author: | DeathMuffin [ Mon May 09, 2011 3:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: "Unofficial" NAPs |
![]() ![]() Edit: Nothing to do with this issue - just been meaning to make this for Kaos for awhile now. |
Author: | Kaos [ Mon May 09, 2011 4:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: "Unofficial" NAPs |
I really like that. Is there anyway you can give it a bit more definition? |
Author: | DeathMuffin [ Mon May 09, 2011 5:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: "Unofficial" NAPs |
Kaos wrote: I really like that. Is there anyway you can give it a bit more definition? Can do. ![]() ![]() |
Author: | jcwiggens [ Mon May 09, 2011 7:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: "Unofficial" NAPs |
Unofficial or Soft NAPS = receipt for disaster |
Author: | Kaos [ Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: "Unofficial" NAPs |
jcwiggens wrote: Unofficial or Soft NAPS = receipt for disaster Agreed and its time to bump this thread since it seems not everyone remembers. |
Author: | Kaos [ Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: "Unofficial" NAPs |
And it is happening again. if you are a baby legion (Tortuga, Undertakers and so on) you can find your current NAPs by going to the Legion tab. About halfway down on the lefthand side there is a button that says "Diplomacy". Click that and you will see a list of all the legions that you have naps with. If the name "Galactic Crusaders" or "Galactic Paladins" is not on that list, you do not have a NAP of any kind with the Galactic Crusaders or Galactic Paladins. If someone told you we did, then they were misinformed. We are not responsible for the misinformation spread by others. We do not give NAPs to baby legions just because we are friendly with their big brothers. This is for several reasons 1) There is not enough room for that many NAPs 2) Our battle tab is already full of people we cannot attack because of NAPs 3) If you aren't a legion that can stand on your own and needs to go crying to a big legion then you aren't worth having a NAP with. (see my other posts about a dolphin game that won't hurt your feelings) If you would like to pay for our embassy to add more NAPs, its upkeep and the production we would lose because we had to replace a module that actually helped us, PM me and we can discuss making a NAP with you. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |