Author |
Message |
JoshFFuller
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:22 am Posts: 910 Location: USA
|

I know I brought this up before when a friendly legion was taken over by someone who was there to "upgrade the base", but I think if you founded a legion, you shouldn't be able to be kicked, and you should have final say. Recently, a friend of mine lost his legion when a member was promoted to co-leader, and then demoted and kicked the old leader. He had a level 3 base he spent money on and had built almost himself. These issues could be avoided and legion dynamics changed for the better if a legion founder was a supreme leader, not being able to be demoted, only by themselves, or kicked and maybe having the power to lock things to only founder? Thoughts on this? EDIT: I am leaning towards this idea: Riptuer wrote: I give a +1 for customizable leadership roles and a +1 to a penultimate founder/leader type role, along with the ability to specify a successor in the event said founder leaves the game. I feel both options would benefit most legion in the current state of the game, and custom leader/officer roles is something I've wanted for my legion for some time!
_________________
Last edited by JoshFFuller on Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:22 am |
|
 |
Lone.Lycan
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:44 am Posts: 3751
|
rule #1... never promote a 2nd person to leader unless you trust them with your offline life...
__________________________ 
Officer Namba1 of The Unknown, Lv.666+ Dark Smuggler

|
Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:25 am |
|
 |
MitchellN
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:44 pm Posts: 1582 Location: Western Australia, Australia
|
JoshFFuller wrote: I know I brought this up before when a friendly legion was taken over by someone who was there to "upgrade the base", but I think if you founded a legion, you shouldn't be able to be kicked, and you should have final say. Recently, a friend of mine lost his legion when a member was promoted to co-leader, and then demoted and kicked the old leader. He had a level 3 base he spent money on and had built almost himself. These issues could be avoided and legion dynamics changed for the better if a legion founder was a supreme leader, not being able to be demoted, only by themselves, or kicked and maybe having the power to lock things to only founder? Thoughts on this? Once again a huge +1!
_________________ Why hello there
|
Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:25 am |
|
 |
sgtlynch
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 10:38 pm Posts: 1300 Location: BattleStar Dysonia
|
Lone.Lycan wrote: rule #1... never promote a 2nd person to leader unless you trust them with your offline life... +1 if you dont aboslutly trust them dont promote them.
_________________ "Seriously.... What's with all these halcyon traps...."
|
Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:41 am |
|
 |
JoshFFuller
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:22 am Posts: 910 Location: USA
|
sgtlynch wrote: Lone.Lycan wrote: rule #1... never promote a 2nd person to leader unless you trust them with your offline life... +1 if you dont aboslutly trust them dont promote them. it's more about having another tier or legion positions, where founder could be with the other leaders, or above it based on build, but I do see your point, I agree it was a bad move, but maybe we should change the legion dynamics
_________________
|
Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:46 am |
|
 |
Hawkeblade
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:29 pm Posts: 3022
|
yes i would love that and also they are always loyal because i have two legions in my Faction and i would like to visit my other legion more often without losing my loyalty bonus.
_________________
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:13 am |
|
 |
Uy23e
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:04 am Posts: 1998
|
JoshFFuller wrote: sgtlynch wrote: Lone.Lycan wrote: rule #1... never promote a 2nd person to leader unless you trust them with your offline life... +1 if you dont aboslutly trust them dont promote them. it's more about having another tier or legion positions, where founder could be with the other leaders, or above it based on build, but I do see your point, I agree it was a bad move, but maybe we should change the legion dynamics what exactly do you think officers are for?
_________________ 当所有传奇写下第一个篇章 原来所谓英雄也和我们一样 私は一発の銃弾、銃弾は人の心を持たない。故に、何も考えない。ただ、目的に向かって飛ぶだけ
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:27 am |
|
 |
Valocis
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 7:32 pm Posts: 582
|
Uy23e wrote: what exactly do you think officers are for?
EXACTLY! Officers can do EVERYTHING a Leader can do! NOT! Officers don't have Powers that Leaders do. Plus, I have Officers that I trust with Officer stuff, but would never trust them as Leaders. +1 TO the Founder Position.
_________________ Founder and Supreme Commander(Former) of the Legion Home One and now its enemy.
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:54 am |
|
 |
Uy23e
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:04 am Posts: 1998
|

Valocis wrote: Uy23e wrote: what exactly do you think officers are for?
EXACTLY! Officers can do EVERYTHING a Leader can do! NOT! Officers don't have Powers that Leaders do. Plus, I have Officers that I trust with Officer stuff, but would never trust them as Leaders. +1 TO the Founder Position. What day-to-day (or even weekly) function can a leader do that officer can't? The point is, you don't need to have loads of leaders. Officers, with their limited power, functions just fine most of the time. Hard to have things go wrong when the legion only have 1-3 leaders. Now, I'm not particularrly against a founder position, or even more postition, customized if possible(for example, atm I seriously won't mind if "accept application" was aviliable to everyone, but I would put kicking players on a higher tier, and perhaps some stuff like assigning officers even higher tier etc) However, that's just because it would be nice and would be a nice addition. The reasons this thread is basing on: the fear of the orginal leader being kicked and/or the legion disbanded etc by a new "leader" does NOT hold water. IMO, while the player who performed such actions is a bad bad person, the fault mainly falls to the orginal leader who promoted such a "bad bad person" to leader. So while I'm not agaisnt the suggestion itself much(although "founder" is a rather useless function IMO, I would perfer customizable positions, maybe 4 different sets that you can tinker with urself), I have a strong dislike of people who seek "fixes" on "problems" that was caused by their own (sorry, can't find a fitting non-insulting word, use your imagination) in the first place.
_________________ 当所有传奇写下第一个篇章 原来所谓英雄也和我们一样 私は一発の銃弾、銃弾は人の心を持たない。故に、何も考えない。ただ、目的に向かって飛ぶだけ
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:30 am |
|
 |
JoshFFuller
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:22 am Posts: 910 Location: USA
|

Uy23e wrote: Valocis wrote: Uy23e wrote: what exactly do you think officers are for?
EXACTLY! Officers can do EVERYTHING a Leader can do! NOT! Officers don't have Powers that Leaders do. Plus, I have Officers that I trust with Officer stuff, but would never trust them as Leaders. +1 TO the Founder Position. What day-to-day (or even weekly) function can a leader do that officer can't? The point is, you don't need to have loads of leaders. Officers, with their limited power, functions just fine most of the time. Hard to have things go wrong when the legion only have 1-3 leaders. Now, I'm not particularrly against a founder position, or even more postition, customized if possible(for example, atm I seriously won't mind if "accept application" was aviliable to everyone, but I would put kicking players on a higher tier, and perhaps some stuff like assigning officers even higher tier etc) However, that's just because it would be nice and would be a nice addition. The reasons this thread is basing on: the fear of the orginal leader being kicked and/or the legion disbanded etc by a new "leader" does NOT hold water. IMO, while the player who performed such actions is a bad bad person, the fault mainly falls to the orginal leader who promoted such a "bad bad person" to leader. So while I'm not agaisnt the suggestion itself much(although "founder" is a rather useless function IMO, I would perfer customizable positions, maybe 4 different sets that you can tinker with urself), I have a strong dislike of people who seek "fixes" on "problems" that was caused by their own (sorry, can't find a fitting non-insulting word, use your imagination) in the first place. fair enough, so customizable positions would be a fair enough alternative
_________________
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:10 am |
|
 |
SpardaOverlord
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:55 pm Posts: 228
|
Though there are some leaders in my legion, very few partake in active day-to-day work. i find it more so that we the officers run the show. Granted we do from time to time consult leaders in legion changing actions, it seems thus far we have been doing pretty well for yourselves
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:25 am |
|
 |
Preliator Xzien
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 2:56 pm Posts: 8877 Location: Behind you... Stop looking behind you...
|
So what if the founder has been gone a long time? Do the current leaders vote on a new founder or is one randomly selected?
_________________P R E L I A T O R||XZIEN Entertainment Extraordinaire ~ Artwork, Writing, Rants, Memes Golgotha wrote: its the attitude of being willing to take on the shark with the right harpoon that sets you above most
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:27 pm |
|
 |
Pertominus
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:21 am Posts: 1091 Location: really wants 2 b in LA....
|
suggested it myself in the past, love the idea. +1 Xzien wrote: So what if the founder has been gone a long time? Do the current leaders vote on a new founder or is one randomly selected? the title falls to the most loyal 'active' leader.
_________________ 
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 3:15 pm |
|
 |
howesy
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 5:40 pm Posts: 3100 Location: Zolazin Prime
|
+1, would love to have a founder 
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 4:45 pm |
|
 |
GhettoGeddon
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 6:17 pm Posts: 468 Location: Australia
|
Here is a ranking system in another game i used to play highest grantable rank was second leader - leader/founder cant be kicked 
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 4:55 pm |
|
 |
Darth Flagitious
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:49 pm Posts: 8964
|
I see this as just another way of idiot-proofing the game. Legions have Officers to help deal with the day to day stuff, so multiple Leaders aren't really necessary. If you are that paranoid that someone you promote to leader would usurp control of the legion, don't promote anyone. Simple, problem solved. The only power that Leaders have that Officers don't is promote/demote (and kicking Officers, but that should be a Leader decision anyway).
Any well-organized, well-run should not have any issues with coup d'etats because they would observe members for a time and get to know them before promoting them even to officer. Giving out insta-crowns is just a recipe for disaster and something you won't see good legions do.
_________________Ranks 400+ Join us in exploring..  [20:40] Wredz: just hacked a massive extremely rich minting planet from someone.. thats the best planet i ever hacked [20:43] DarthFlagitious: is it spearmint or peppermint?
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:07 pm |
|
 |
GhettoGeddon
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 6:17 pm Posts: 468 Location: Australia
|
I only posted it for the others, in my legion there will only be 1 leader and thats me, i will promote members to officers but thats it
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:11 pm |
|
 |
Preliator Xzien
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 2:56 pm Posts: 8877 Location: Behind you... Stop looking behind you...
|
Darth Flagitious wrote: I see this as just another way of idiot-proofing the game. Legions have Officers to help deal with the day to day stuff, so multiple Leaders aren't really necessary. If you are that paranoid that someone you promote to leader would usurp control of the legion, don't promote anyone. Simple, problem solved. The only power that Leaders have that Officers don't is promote/demote (and kicking Officers, but that should be a Leader decision anyway).
Any well-organized, well-run should not have any issues with coup d'etats because they would observe members for a time and get to know them before promoting them even to officer. Giving out insta-crowns is just a recipe for disaster and something you won't see good legions do. If you don't like it you don't have to use it.
_________________P R E L I A T O R||XZIEN Entertainment Extraordinaire ~ Artwork, Writing, Rants, Memes Golgotha wrote: its the attitude of being willing to take on the shark with the right harpoon that sets you above most
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 6:02 pm |
|
 |
Hawkeblade
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:29 pm Posts: 3022
|
well the way have my two legions set up is two leaders one who stays all the time and one mobile leader that goes out and handles affairs face to face. Also with two leaders if one goes inactive w.o notice there is a second leader to make sure the Legion doesnt fall apart and also when one mobile leader is away a trusted officer is promoted to a temp leader spot to be trained as leader and get some leadership experiance. Also i dont have to worry about coups because the officers i have know have fought along side me for almost a year.
_________________
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:49 pm |
|
 |
Lone.Lycan
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:44 am Posts: 3751
|
Darth Flagitious wrote: I see this as just another way of idiot-proofing the game. Legions have Officers to help deal with the day to day stuff, so multiple Leaders aren't really necessary. If you are that paranoid that someone you promote to leader would usurp control of the legion, don't promote anyone. Simple, problem solved. The only power that Leaders have that Officers don't is promote/demote (and kicking Officers, but that should be a Leader decision anyway).
Any well-organized, well-run should not have any issues with coup d'etats because they would observe members for a time and get to know them before promoting them even to officer. Giving out insta-crowns is just a recipe for disaster and something you won't see good legions do. anything that "idiot-proofs" is only bait to find a better idiot
__________________________ 
Officer Namba1 of The Unknown, Lv.666+ Dark Smuggler

|
Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:28 am |
|
 |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|