View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Aug 04, 2025 12:11 pm



Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 Planet 2 plane of construction 

Like the idea?
yes 58%  58%  [ 7 ]
no 33%  33%  [ 4 ]
undecided. 8%  8%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 12

 Planet 2 plane of construction 
Author Message

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:43 pm
Posts: 494
Reply with quote
This have been annoying me for quite some time is that when you construct cloak satalites It somehows takes up space on the planet yet the satalite is in space as well as some others building. (I think)

What I propose is 2 planes of building. One is on the surface of the planet and the second is in space.
There should be less space to build in the space plane because the buildings must be far apart.

_________________
Image
No surrender.


Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:57 pm
Profile

Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 3:20 am
Posts: 616
Reply with quote
If you're gonna go this route it would just be better to do what Noc said and have 2 structure zones. One only for resource structures and another only for defensive structures.


Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:12 pm
Profile

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 4:04 am
Posts: 641
Reply with quote
I do like this idea.

_________________
Image


Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:15 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:49 pm
Posts: 8964
Reply with quote
silentknight wrote:
If you're gonna go this route it would just be better to do what Noc said and have 2 structure zones. One only for resource structures and another only for defensive structures.

Which would actually balance out because the space plane is going to be a significantly larger sphere than the planet.


silentknight wrote:
If you're gonna go this route it would just be better to do what Noc said and have 2 structure zones. One only for resource structures and another only for defensive structures.

Where would Population constructs fit?

_________________
Ranks 400+ Join us in exploring..
ImageImage

[20:40] Wredz: just hacked a massive extremely rich minting planet from someone.. thats the best planet i ever hacked
[20:43] DarthFlagitious: is it spearmint or peppermint?


Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:24 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 3:20 am
Posts: 616
Reply with quote
That counts as planet defense, so in the defensive zone.


Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:33 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:48 am
Posts: 3900
Reply with quote
technically the minefields and cloak satellites are in space, and the shield generators are on the planet. i like this idea.

_________________
Image
Image


Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:05 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 6:22 pm
Posts: 1760
Location: On the bridge of the Vikiera
Reply with quote
I say:
+1 to surface and space zones
-1 to production and defense zones

_________________
Image
I have suggested 7 Races, 5 Organizations, 3 locations, 3 materials, and 20 planets.
View my profile interests for a full list.


Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:06 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:48 am
Posts: 3900
Reply with quote
zophah wrote:
I say:
+1 to surface and space zones
-1 to production and defense zones

yes

_________________
Image
Image


Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:10 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:05 pm
Posts: 943
Reply with quote
I like the idea ,
really ticks me off that satellites and mine fields take up planetary spaces :ugeek:

_________________
Image

Image


Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:15 pm
Profile

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:32 am
Posts: 4524
Reply with quote
Realism and technicalities aren't all that important in a game like this; having them take up space on a planet despite technically not being on the planet is for balancing purposes. If they did what you're suggesting they'd just need to decrease the space on the planet and make that space be in orbit (such as a planet going from 51 space to 15 on the planet and 16 in orbit, for example) which would just force you to get those structures and not have as many planet-based structures as you want.

-1


Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:23 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 12:43 am
Posts: 1122
Reply with quote
So basically you want to even more overpower planets. By giving them more space. Or you're saying you want to reduce space you can put production and have some of the space dedicated to cloaking and mines, and nothing other than cloaking and mines.

Ok, -1.

_________________
Headless wrote:
The ship ran out of gas, a group of Inergons got into the Romulan Ale, and there are Space Herpes everywhere. Help, I need allies!

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=9503 The 1.8 Adventure Update thread


Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:24 pm
Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:43 pm
Posts: 494
Reply with quote
2 planes of construction would make the planet more complex is a nice way.
Robert wrote:
So basically you want to even more overpower planets. By giving them more space. Or you're saying you want to reduce space you can put production and have some of the space dedicated to cloaking and mines, and nothing other than cloaking and mines.

Ok, -1.

Scan easily overpowers cloak, And planets are still very easy to take.

_________________
Image
No surrender.


Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:19 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:48 am
Posts: 3900
Reply with quote
Robert wrote:
So basically you want to even more overpower planets. By giving them more space. Or you're saying you want to reduce space you can put production and have some of the space dedicated to cloaking and mines, and nothing other than cloaking and mines.

Ok, -1.


the space is already there, we just cant use it. this will let us build structures around our planet, making more space available. i do not see how this will overpower our planets.

_________________
Image
Image


Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:28 pm
Profile

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:32 am
Posts: 4524
Reply with quote
Planets are only still easy to take if people have bad tech or don't bother protecting them; for 4 space you can significantly counter someone with a similar tech level, and if it's a planet really care about and put a couple artifacts on it'll be fine.


Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:31 pm
Profile

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:32 am
Posts: 4524
Reply with quote
Vekno wrote:
Robert wrote:
So basically you want to even more overpower planets. By giving them more space. Or you're saying you want to reduce space you can put production and have some of the space dedicated to cloaking and mines, and nothing other than cloaking and mines.

Ok, -1.


the space is already there, we just cant use it. this will let us build structures around our planet, making more space available. i do not see how this will overpower our planets.


That's what he said, you'd be giving them more space, which could easily overpower a planet because they're balanced for the amount of space they have now.


Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:32 pm
Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:43 pm
Posts: 494
Reply with quote
FerrusManus wrote:
Vekno wrote:

the space is already there, we just cant use it. this will let us build structures around our planet, making more space available. i do not see how this will overpower our planets.


That's what he said, you'd be giving them more space, which could easily overpower a planet because they're balanced for the amount of space they have now.


From what I see currently, Players overpower legions More space would balance it out. It would only mainly add more cloak which the planets desperately needs. But if 2 planes are suggested the minefields and shields need to revert back to their orginal construction space.

I propose that the amount of construction space in space is equal to 50% of the maxium construction space on the planet itself.

_________________
Image
No surrender.


Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:31 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 12:43 am
Posts: 1122
Reply with quote
No, I do not want versatility to be taken away from the planet. And I do not want any more space to be added to the planet even if seperate.

_________________
Headless wrote:
The ship ran out of gas, a group of Inergons got into the Romulan Ale, and there are Space Herpes everywhere. Help, I need allies!

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=9503 The 1.8 Adventure Update thread


Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:54 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 6:22 pm
Posts: 1760
Location: On the bridge of the Vikiera
Reply with quote
How about putting the larger size back on the defense and attack modules and then adding the size in orbit? And also for this to ever be implemented we need to think through what goes in orbit and what goes on the surface.

_________________
Image
I have suggested 7 Races, 5 Organizations, 3 locations, 3 materials, and 20 planets.
View my profile interests for a full list.


Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:15 am
Profile

Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 1:16 am
Posts: 3824
Reply with quote
zophah wrote:
How about putting the larger size back on the defense and attack modules and then adding the size in orbit? And also for this to ever be implemented we need to think through what goes in orbit and what goes on the surface.

Moon tab: only allows weapons/defense/cloak buildings to be built, make it easy no artifact buildings either.


Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:49 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:48 am
Posts: 3900
Reply with quote
i really hope they implement the moon idea. it seemed like a really good one.

_________________
Image
Image


Sun Jan 02, 2011 5:24 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.