Author |
Message |
senatorhung
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am Posts: 3472
|
Littlefluffy wrote: Scanning Power: 18116 Planets Discovered: 1292 wiki updated: http://galaxylegion.com/wiki/index.php/ ... s_Per_Scanalso added credits for the pilots who provided the scan info.
_________________Rank 3950 Litheor Governor 100% DCR r385-r2200 GL Marauder #26 _____________ PvP leaderboards: 70212 raids: #1; 40852 kills: #1; 96377 hacks: #3;
|
Sat Dec 08, 2012 1:08 pm |
|
|
Chloron
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:47 pm Posts: 1513
|
After 2 hrs of re-arranging scan mods and scanning and 3050 energy spent (though I'm far from finished) here are my initial results. I started with 181 planets in my database. I couldn't get down to just my own planets because a couple had vortex deflectors, 1 was exotica , and one had an xrp warp inhibitor (please +1 my thread here http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=31521 ) Scan . . Planets 1302 . . 182 1320 . . 183 1330 . . 184 1340 . . 185 1355 . . 186 1360 . . 187 1380 . . 188 1390 . . 189 1400 . . 190 1410 . . 191 1420 . . 192 1430 . . 193 1440 . . 194 1455 . . 195 1465 . . 196 1480 . . 197 1490 . . 198 1500 . . 199 1510 . . 200 1520 . . 201 1535 . . 202 1540 . . 203 1559 . . 204 1560 . . 205 1580 . . 206 1590 . . 207 1600 . . 208 1615 . . 209 1620 . . 210 1640 . . 211 1650 . . 212 1660 . . 213 1670 . . 214 1680 . . 215 1698 . . 216 1700 . . 217 Increasing by 5 in between scans, I only encountered 2x where I could scan more than 1 planet (in which cases I purged 1 and lowered scan a bit to find the exact number - those cases were 1559 and 1698 and I started at 1302).
_________________XxDarthDexterxX wrote: You deserve a cookie, and earn yourself one cookie point.
|
Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:15 pm |
|
|
Wertz
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:12 pm Posts: 37
|
Scanning Power: 4714 Planets Discovered: 445 - greyed out
_________________
|
Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:55 pm |
|
|
Chloron
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:47 pm Posts: 1513
|
A couple more hours of of arranging and re-arranging scan mods and scanning and 7505 MORE energy and here are some more results. (Again, please +1 my thread here http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=31521 ) Scan . . Planets 1720 . . 218 1725 . . 219 1740 . . 220 1755 . . 221 1760 . . 222 1780 . . 223 1785 . . 224 1800 . . 225 1815 . . 226 1820 . . 227 1840 . . 228 1845 . . 229 1860 . . 230 1875 . . 231 1880 . . 232 1900 . . 233 1905 . . 234 1920 . . 235 1935 . . 236 1940 . . 237 1960 . . 238 1965 . . 239 1980 . . 240 1995 . . 241 2000 . . 242 2020 . . 243 2025 . . 244 2040 . . 245 2055 . . 246 2060 . . 247 2080 . . 248 2090 . . 249 2100 . . 250 2119 . . 251 2120 . . 252 2140 . . 253 2150 . . 254 2160 . . 255 2180 . . 256 2185 . . 257 2200 . . 258 2215 . . 259 2220 . . 260 2240 . . 261 2250 . . 262 2260 . . 263 2280 . . 264 2285 . . 265 2300 . . 266 2315 . . 267 2320 . . 268 2340 . . 269 2350 . . 270 2360 . . 271 2380 . . 272 2385 . . 273 2400 . . 274 2418 . . 275 2420 . . 276 2440 . . 277 2450 . . 278 2460 . . 279 2480 . . 280 2485 . . 281 2500 . . 282 2519 . . 2520 . . 283, 284 Again, I was increasing by 5 in between scans, and again I encountered 2x where I could scan more than 1 planet (in which cases I purged 1 and lowered scan a bit to find the exact number - those cases were scan 2119 and scan 2418). Another oddity was my last scan for the day (cause I'm tired of looking at these horrible planets!) at scan 2520. At scan 2519 the button was grayed out, but scan 2520 allowed me to scan planets 283 and 284, so the required scan for 283 must be something like 2519.xxx but I haven't been using any scan buffs (to keep it easy to figure my scan mods, etc.) so can't be sure on that one. I'll be doing more tomorrow if anyone can start trying to figure out the equation, that'd be nice
_________________XxDarthDexterxX wrote: You deserve a cookie, and earn yourself one cookie point.
|
Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:02 pm |
|
|
Silver_Stiched_Crow
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:56 pm Posts: 1403
|
That's very interesting.
|
Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:31 am |
|
|
StolenPlanet
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:54 am Posts: 1208
|
good list
_________________
|
Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:42 am |
|
|
Silens
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:42 am Posts: 779
|
Hope this helps you find your equation. I can do a graph between scan values of, say, 0 and 3000 to give you a better detailed look at that curved region.
_________________
|
Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:29 pm |
|
|
Chloron
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:47 pm Posts: 1513
|
Here's another run for today. I'm thinking that I may jump up to around 5k and continue scanning from there as I believe we have enough data for this segment or the scale, but that won't be till tomorrow, so if anyone has a compelling reason not to do that, let me know. (Only 5,420 energy used this time and again, please +1 my thread here http://galaxylegion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=31521 ) Scan . . Planets 2540 . . 285 2555 . . 286 2560 . . 287 2580 . . 288 2595 . . 289 2600 . . 290 2620 . . 291 2630 . . 292 2640 . . 293 2660 . . 294 2665 . . 295 2680 . . 296 2699 . . 297 2700 . . 298 2720 . . 299 2735 . . 300 2740 . . 301 2760 . . 302 2775 . . 303 2780 . . 304 2800 . . 305 2810 . . 306 2820 . . 307 2840 . . 308 2850 . . 309 2860 . . 310 2880 . . 311 2885 . . 312 2900 . . 313 2920 . . 314 2925 . . 315 2940 . . 316 2959 . . 2960 . . 317, 318 2980 . . 319 2999 . . 320 3000 . . 321 3020 . . 322 3039 . . 323 3040 . . 324 3060 . . 325 3079 . . 326 3080 . . 327 3100 . . 328 3119 . . 329 3120 . . 330 As before, I was increasing by 5 in between scans, and like before I encountered 5x where I could scan more than 1 planet (in which cases I purged 1 and lowered scan a bit to find the exact number - those cases were scan 2699, 2999, 3039, 3079, and scan 3119). This is only important in that there won't be deviation in these scan numbers, whereas (for example) planet 328 may have been found with scan 3096, 3097, 3098, 3099, or 3100. like my last post, I found that similar % anomaly at scan 2959. The button was gray but 2960 allowed me to scan planets 317 and 318. So (like 283) the required scan for 317 must be something like 2959.xxx but I haven't been using any scan buffs (to keep it easy to figure my scan mods, etc.) so can't be sure on that one. Also, thanks for the scatterplot.
_________________XxDarthDexterxX wrote: You deserve a cookie, and earn yourself one cookie point.
|
Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:32 pm |
|
|
bobdebouwer
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:13 am Posts: 897
|
scan 7671 grey out at 645 planets
_________________
|
Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:49 pm |
|
|
Silens
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:42 am Posts: 779
|
In response to the wiki; there are a few numbers in the first chunk of the list (Idk if there are later on) where two scan numbers are provided for the same number of planets. (I think 105 repeats with two scan values with differ by less than 10). I think that the ultimate goal should be 1 box for every 'Max no. of planets' (I.E. 1..n, n being the max number of planets possible to scan) and the lowest scan value needed to scan that many planets.
I.E.
Min Scan | Max Planets
1 | 1 5 | 2 10 | 3
And so on.... (These are probably incorrect values, for the record; I just pulled arbitrary numbers out of the air).
_________________
|
Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:51 pm |
|
|
senatorhung
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 am Posts: 3472
|
Silens wrote: In response to the wiki; there are a few numbers in the first chunk of the list (Idk if there are later on) where two scan numbers are provided for the same number of planets. (I think 105 repeats with two scan values with differ by less than 10). I think that the ultimate goal should be 1 box for every 'Max no. of planets' (I.E. 1..n, n being the max number of planets possible to scan) and the lowest scan value needed to scan that many planets. nope, the ultimate goal is to eliminate the table altogether once we come up with the equation that describes the curve. [i'm assuming that was ODragon's intention when he started the table]. the more data points for that right now, the better. the other thing to try after that is to see if we can get a parallel curve for the 'good' scan line and that will cover the majority of queries about planetary scanning. [will update the wiki with the latest points tonight - was too tuckered last nite]
_________________Rank 3950 Litheor Governor 100% DCR r385-r2200 GL Marauder #26 _____________ PvP leaderboards: 70212 raids: #1; 40852 kills: #1; 96377 hacks: #3;
|
Wed Dec 12, 2012 2:16 pm |
|
|
Silens
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:42 am Posts: 779
|
Dan might've configured the scanning to give you two different equations for scan values though (one equation between, say, 0 and 2000 and then another for everything else). The graph doesn't look like a consistent curve; it might even be discontinuous.
_________________
|
Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:27 pm |
|
|
Chloron
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:47 pm Posts: 1513
|
So I did my run a bit differently today. After doing a bit from where I left off I jumped a bit and did about 5-10 scans by 5s then jumped about 300-500 scan and did another set of 5-10 scans so we could get a bit more information as the curve gets higher. I also found a lower scan requirement for 473 planets than the 5200 scan posted elsewhere (I got 473 planets at 5119 scan). Also 11,265 energy used through this one (good thing I've got some spare cubes and tri's ) Scan . . Planets 3140 . . 331 3155 . . 332 3160 . . 333 3180 . . 334 3195 . . 335 3200 . . 336 3220 . . 337 3235 . . 338 3240 . . 339 3260 . . 340 3275 . . 341 3280 . . 342 3300 . . 343 3319 . . 344 3320 . . 345 3340 . . 346 3359 . . 347 3360 . . 348 3380 . . 349 4070 . . 399 4080 . . 400 4095 . . 401 4100 . . 402 4120 . . 403 4139 . . 404 4140 . . 405 4160 . . 406 4180 . . 407 4190 . . 408 4205 . . 409 4460 . . 427 4470 . . 428 4480 . . 429 4500 . . 430 4519 . . 431 4520 . . 432 5030 . . 467 5040 . . 468 5060 . . 469 5065 . . 470 5080 . . 471 5100 . . 472 5119 . . 473 5120 . . 474 And I finally found some planets I could actually colonize/invade!
_________________XxDarthDexterxX wrote: You deserve a cookie, and earn yourself one cookie point.
|
Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:01 pm |
|
|
Darth Flagitious
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:49 pm Posts: 8964
|
Actually, aside from the very low (>~2000) and those couple burps at ~11k, it looks like a direct linear relationship... But then I haven't had my coffee yet...
_________________Ranks 400+ Join us in exploring..[20:40] Wredz: just hacked a massive extremely rich minting planet from someone.. thats the best planet i ever hacked [20:43] DarthFlagitious: is it spearmint or peppermint?
|
Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:03 pm |
|
|
Chakotay
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:30 pm Posts: 1529
|
no buff scan 8010 696 planets scanned Planet scan button greyed out.
|
Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:18 pm |
|
|
Chakotay
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:30 pm Posts: 1529
|
also I don't think you want to be explorer when you do these too .. right?
|
Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:20 pm |
|
|
Silens
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:42 am Posts: 779
|
Darth Flagitious wrote: Actually, aside from the very low (>~2000 I'm presuming you mean <~2000 here, not greater than 2000.) and those couple burps at ~11k, it looks like a direct linear relationship... But then I haven't had my coffee yet... The <~2000 was my point... There's a curve between 0 and 2000 and a linear relationship from there-on. This possibly represents two different equations being used (Which would be backed up by a discontinuity).
_________________
|
Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:37 pm |
|
|
Darth Flagitious
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:49 pm Posts: 8964
|
Yeah... ALWAYS click the wrong one....
_________________Ranks 400+ Join us in exploring..[20:40] Wredz: just hacked a massive extremely rich minting planet from someone.. thats the best planet i ever hacked [20:43] DarthFlagitious: is it spearmint or peppermint?
|
Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:41 pm |
|
|
Silens
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:42 am Posts: 779
|
We're missing loads of values for scans 1 > ~500
We really need these, I think; more important than gettings loads of high scan values.
_________________
|
Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:01 am |
|
|
Peticks
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:44 pm Posts: 1997 Location: Causing chaos somewhere
|
Silens wrote: We're missing loads of values for scans 1 < ~500
We really need these, I think; more important than gettings loads of high scan values. fixed it
_________________Meow chika meow meow!!Stark Tech Inside
|
Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:45 pm |
|
|
|