View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jul 27, 2025 11:03 am



Reply to topic  [ 192 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next
 Autoranking solution 
Author Message

Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 9:13 am
Posts: 1695
Reply with quote
Just pulling this from another thread where i posted it..
Dan is against autoranking, but instead of making ratios even lower (purger mission is just fine now)

Increase the amount of exp per level, now it is static +40 every level, from 1 to 99999999

Simply making something like this
1-100 40exp
101-200 80 exp
201-300 120 exp

Per level instead of always a 40 increment.

Now i can see for those ranks it would be a little unfair so doing that from rank 500 would solve it for a while.


Don't forget the numbers i put there are a example.. personally i think they should increase faster.

_________________
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
████▌▄▌▄▐▐▌█████
████▌▄▌▄▐▐▌▀████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Image
Image


Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:24 am
Profile

Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 1:57 pm
Posts: 172
Reply with quote
That would be interesting. I would agree faster would be needed, some get enough artifacts to easily keep up with that no matter what.


Dan could also put caps on either the Engineers, or all crew like some wanted. (All the ones that don't like the SSB.


Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:02 am
Profile

Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 9:13 am
Posts: 1695
Reply with quote
Feldshan wrote:
That would be interesting. I would agree faster would be needed, some get enough artifacts to easily keep up with that no matter what.


Dan could also put caps on either the Engineers, or all crew like some wanted. (All the ones that don't like the SSB.

I don't agree on caps, one of the great things about GL compared to any other FB game is the freedom of choice on how you do things, if it would be really hard to keep up the engineers for most, it would be good, there will still be some people able to autorank, but in that case it would be more of a achievement than "loophole".

_________________
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
████▌▄▌▄▐▐▌█████
████▌▄▌▄▐▐▌▀████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Image
Image


Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:10 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:08 am
Posts: 3142
Reply with quote
Feldshan wrote:
That would be interesting.


Dan could also put caps on either the Engineers, or all crew like some wanted. (All the ones that don't like the SSB.

That makes no sense. Means all ships would be the same.

As to the op: I would say it shouldn't start till 2200.
Shouldn't be penalized for starting earlier, and dans gonna have to catch up to the high ranks now.

This would make it easier to keep up for dan.

_________________
Image
http://www.universegenesis.com/bonus.php?id=7704&rofl=1f1616039121f25&lol=72141855&boss=SteelWolverine


ICBLF wrote:
to be honest, I was rooting for you even while eating KVTs


Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:21 am
Profile

Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 9:13 am
Posts: 1695
Reply with quote
KJReed wrote:
Feldshan wrote:
That would be interesting.


Dan could also put caps on either the Engineers, or all crew like some wanted. (All the ones that don't like the SSB.

That makes no sense. Means all ships would be the same.

As to the op: I would say it shouldn't start till 2200.
Shouldn't be penalized for starting earlier, and dans gonna have to catch up to the high ranks now.

This would make it easier to keep up for dan.


You are trying to make the same point as the complainers did about the purger mission nerf...

If he starts it at 2200 the damage will already be done.

_________________
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
████▌▄▌▄▐▐▌█████
████▌▄▌▄▐▐▌▀████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Image
Image


Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:31 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:30 am
Posts: 4230
Reply with quote
Or, we can just leave . that wil solve a lot of things.

_________________
Image
Image
RNG makes mistake one time, People blame it for life. Damn sucks to be it.


Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:50 am
Profile

Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 9:13 am
Posts: 1695
Reply with quote
itsSoulPLayAgain wrote:
Or, we can just leave . that wil solve a lot of things.

Allright Cya, remove the cloak from your planets while you´re at it.

No offtopic/pointless -1 posts
if you post -1 make sure you have a damn good reason since Dan is against autoranking and you know it.

_________________
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
████▌▄▌▄▐▐▌█████
████▌▄▌▄▐▐▌▀████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Image
Image


Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:54 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:08 am
Posts: 3142
Reply with quote
failname wrote:
KJReed wrote:
Feldshan wrote:
That would be interesting.


Dan could also put caps on either the Engineers, or all crew like some wanted. (All the ones that don't like the SSB.

That makes no sense. Means all ships would be the same.

As to the op: I would say it shouldn't start till 2200.
Shouldn't be penalized for starting earlier, and dans gonna have to catch up to the high ranks now.

This would make it easier to keep up for dan.


You are trying to make the same point as the complainers did about the purger mission nerf...

If he starts it at 2200 the damage will already be done.


Unless he plans to ignore the highest ranks that damage is done.
If there weren't certain rank limits on npcs it wouldn't be a big deal, but as it is going and changing the whole ranking system after the fact imo isn't fair to the upper ranks.

_________________
Image
http://www.universegenesis.com/bonus.php?id=7704&rofl=1f1616039121f25&lol=72141855&boss=SteelWolverine


ICBLF wrote:
to be honest, I was rooting for you even while eating KVTs


Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:14 am
Profile

Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:02 am
Posts: 92
Reply with quote
failname wrote:
itsSoulPLayAgain wrote:
Or, we can just leave . that wil solve a lot of things.

Allright Cya, remove the cloak from your planets while you´re at it.

No offtopic/pointless -1 posts
if you post -1 make sure you have a damn good reason since Dan is against autoranking and you know it.


-1 to the offtopic rage post.

_________________
ImageImage


Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:40 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 3632
Location: Gone.
Reply with quote
Km4cK2 wrote:
failname wrote:
itsSoulPLayAgain wrote:
Or, we can just leave . that wil solve a lot of things.

Allright Cya, remove the cloak from your planets while you´re at it.

No offtopic/pointless -1 posts
if you post -1 make sure you have a damn good reason since Dan is against autoranking and you know it.


-1 to the offtopic rage post.

-1 to the -1 to the offtopic rage post. :mrgreen:

_________________
Image

Devastation - Rank 1209 - Proud Officer of Imperium of Namalak


Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:44 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:26 pm
Posts: 1621
Location: Orbiting the ruins of your base
Reply with quote
There is no way to defeat autoranking (which doesnt need to be done anyway imo) without hurting the smaller ships more than anybody. The people who are autoranking have enough energy that it wont matter much if the xp is changed.
Autoranking is just a gameplay strategy just like different sized ship builds are. It has its rewards and drawbacks just like anything else. I imagine the only reason Dan was against it was because then he had to listen to all the complaints about high rank content. That issue has largely been solved now with the exception of the cutoff for to carriers, etc.

_________________
Image
"Honor is a fool's prize, glory is of no use to the dead"


Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:47 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:50 pm
Posts: 1010
Reply with quote
DarthRavadge wrote:
There is no way to defeat autoranking (which doesnt need to be done anyway imo) without hurting the smaller ships more than anybody. The people who are autoranking have enough energy that it wont matter much if the xp is changed.
Autoranking is just a gameplay strategy just like different sized ship builds are. It has its rewards and drawbacks just like anything else. I imagine the only reason Dan was against it was because then he had to listen to all the complaints about high rank content. That issue has largely been solved now with the exception of the cutoff for to carriers, etc.


As long as prisoners are in player, Darth is correct. There is no way to beat auto ranking.
Even so, players can still auto rank off the purger mission at 50 EXP.

Regardless what ever dan put in, auto ranking will remain.
Unless he kills the game and freezes every ones ranks.

~JF~

_________________
Image
Give Respect To Gain Respect, Never Demand it,
Treat Others, How you would like to be treated,
Manners Doesn't cost anything,
Those who dont follow these rules, aren't worth knowing,
Member of The Unknown.

~John Falls~


Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:50 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:44 pm
Posts: 1997
Location: Causing chaos somewhere
Reply with quote
John Falls wrote:
DarthRavadge wrote:
There is no way to defeat autoranking (which doesnt need to be done anyway imo) without hurting the smaller ships more than anybody. The people who are autoranking have enough energy that it wont matter much if the xp is changed.
Autoranking is just a gameplay strategy just like different sized ship builds are. It has its rewards and drawbacks just like anything else. I imagine the only reason Dan was against it was because then he had to listen to all the complaints about high rank content. That issue has largely been solved now with the exception of the cutoff for to carriers, etc.


As long as prisoners are in player, Darth is correct. There is no way to beat auto ranking.
Even so, players can still auto rank off the purger mission at 50 EXP.

Regardless what ever dan put in, auto ranking will remain.
Unless he kills the game and freezes every ones ranks.

~JF~

Or he could remove the energy refill on rank up. that would stop Auto ranking

_________________
Image
Image
Meow chika meow meow!!
Stark Tech Inside


Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:59 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 1:42 am
Posts: 1148
Reply with quote
Why do people make autoranking out to be so bad? playing the Game requires energy relays are virtually useless at providing you energy so the only way to be able to play is to auto rank...

To fill my energy bar up takes 6 days atm with max recharge am i really expected to wait that long each time i want to rank up? i'd get bored and quit way before then.

people who rank fast choose to rank fast because they enjoy the game we don't even need dan to add more content we just need him to stop taking away all the dam content we enjoy.

_________________
Image
Image


Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:58 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:05 am
Posts: 2794
Reply with quote
There is nothing you can do to stop autoranking unless you remove the free refill you get from ranking.

_________________
Image
Image
Treeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
That's meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee


Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:32 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:49 pm
Posts: 2085
Reply with quote
Tree7304 wrote:
There is nothing you can do to stop autoranking unless you remove the free refill you get from ranking.


Ok. There's definitely more balance needed here. We never intended there to be a way to have near-infinite amounts of energy. The amount of free refill could scale down at certain ranks.


Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:55 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:20 pm
Posts: 1195
Location: The Milky Way
Reply with quote
Thank you Dan for updating us on your stance on this. Given your last comment, I would suggest instituting a maximum amount of energy refunded upon level up. Maybe 10-15k? Enough to still get a fair amount of things done, but not enough to auto rank at higher ranks.

At this point I can't foresee any changes to rank up refills being met with unanimous consent, as some users will inevitably see it as a punishment.

_________________
Image


Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:00 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:08 am
Posts: 3142
Reply with quote
instead of a hard cap maybe a max of 15k or 35x rank(EDIT: should have said 8.75x rank) whichever is higher.

numbers are somewhat arbitrary, but i dont think there should just be a max to the amount that you get as later on it will get longer and longer between ranks.

_________________
Image
http://www.universegenesis.com/bonus.php?id=7704&rofl=1f1616039121f25&lol=72141855&boss=SteelWolverine


ICBLF wrote:
to be honest, I was rooting for you even while eating KVTs


Last edited by KJReed on Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:21 am, edited 1 time in total.



Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:04 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:20 pm
Posts: 1195
Location: The Milky Way
Reply with quote
KJReed wrote:
instead of a hard cap maybe a max of 15k or 35x rank whichever is higher.

numbers are somewhat arbitrary, but i dont think there should just be a max to the amount that you get as later on it will get longer and longer between ranks.


Anything with a % or rank based multiplier can only make auto ranking harder to do, but not impossible. It would have to be a set number. Granted the number could be tiered, such as 5k max refill on ships below rank 100, 10k max refill on ships below 2k etc, but it would have to be a set number.

_________________
Image


Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:07 am
Profile

Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 903
Reply with quote
webguydan wrote:
Tree7304 wrote:
There is nothing you can do to stop autoranking unless you remove the free refill you get from ranking.


Ok. There's definitely more balance needed here. We never intended there to be a way to have near-infinite amounts of energy. The amount of free refill could scale down at certain ranks.


No
-1

There are already ways to get a 1:1 ratio and even less if people want to autorank then Thats there own fault

_________________
Image ImageClick banner to join legion


Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:07 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 192 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.