Author |
Message |
Hawkeblade
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:29 pm Posts: 3022
|
I dont know if it has been suggested yet but i looked back a bit and didnt see it, but i think that the Base lvls should be on the leaderboards. it would be nice to see how legions bases stack up to each other. because we have the total ranks of a legion, its strength too, why not have its Epicenter the Base be apart of it too.
_________________
|
Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:45 pm |
|
 |
detregets
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:37 am Posts: 2637
|
+1
|
Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:27 pm |
|
 |
FerrusManus
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:32 am Posts: 4524
|
Yeah, it's been suggested before, but most of us agreed that there are too few levels for it to work; if it showed the top 50, there would be 2 level 7s, a few level 6s, and then most of them would be tied at 5, and the rest tied at 4 (if 4 even makes it).
|
Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:36 pm |
|
 |
Willeitner
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 4:04 am Posts: 641
|
I think 1 base lvl and amount of bases taken down
_________________
|
Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:37 pm |
|
 |
detregets
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:37 am Posts: 2637
|
FerrusManus wrote: Yeah, it's been suggested before, but most of us agreed that there are too few levels for it to work; if it showed the top 50, there would be 2 level 7s, a few level 6s, and then most of them would be tied at 5, and the rest tied at 4 (if 4 even makes it). so what ? i'll bet the original leaderboard started with rank 1's
|
Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:37 pm |
|
 |
FerrusManus
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:32 am Posts: 4524
|
detregets wrote: FerrusManus wrote: Yeah, it's been suggested before, but most of us agreed that there are too few levels for it to work; if it showed the top 50, there would be 2 level 7s, a few level 6s, and then most of them would be tied at 5, and the rest tied at 4 (if 4 even makes it). so what ? i'll bet the original leaderboard started with rank 1's So it would always be that way, unlike the other leaderboards. There will probably never be more than a 5 level difference between the top and bottom one, it's just a big tie, and a bunch of Bases just as good as others aren't on there because there wouldn't be space for all the equal ones. I like the idea of a Base kill leaderboard though, except it could perhaps be a "Silver Badges earned," so it takes into account how much they did and the Base level.
|
Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:41 pm |
|
 |
detregets
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:37 am Posts: 2637
|
FerrusManus wrote: detregets wrote: FerrusManus wrote: Yeah, it's been suggested before, but most of us agreed that there are too few levels for it to work; if it showed the top 50, there would be 2 level 7s, a few level 6s, and then most of them would be tied at 5, and the rest tied at 4 (if 4 even makes it). so what ? i'll bet the original leaderboard started with rank 1's So it would always be that way, unlike the other leaderboards. There will probably never be more than a 5 level difference between the top and bottom one, it's just a big tie, and a bunch of Bases just as good as others aren't on there because there wouldn't be space for all the equal ones. I like the idea of a Base kill leaderboard though, except it could perhaps be a "Silver Badges earned," so it takes into account how much they did and the Base level. well, there are multiple leaderboards for legions and players....so make multiples for the base ! =D
|
Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:45 pm |
|
 |
|